Earlier quoted context omitted.
Obviously Maduro is a problematic despotic leader, but who are Facebook to be arbiters of thrush and falsehood? We’ve gone down the path of good intentions that leads to hell. Does this not interfere with self determination? Is there one true north now? Have Facebook found all truth? This is getting ridiculous.
For their own platform? Facebook is, obviously. How is this even a question? It's not like a head of state doesn't have plenty of power to send messages through other means. Since when are private actors obligated to let them speak on private platforms?
>Since when are private actors obligated to let them speak on private platforms?
This is the same argument slave owners used to defend their "private property", and that business owners used to ban black people from their private property.
So, judging by the history of human rights, it's a perfectly valid question