Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love the position of the Swedish flag in that photo. Given that the accident happened in Germany and the ship is Taiwanese. It is just freaky, I don't know if it is good or bad to be associated with such an incident. In a plane crash they are usually quick to paint over the name of the airline company to not be associated. I don't think this is the same though.
Can't see the flag, because the whole page is blocked by some BS (presumably in german). Blocking own content or creating obstacles to see it ... what can be more ridiculous. I just close such web pages and never come back.
Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
421–430 of 462 posts
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#422Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow. The magnitude of global trade is insane!
It's a lot quieter than it used to be. Even worse for planes on flight radar 24.
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#423Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#424Earlier quoted context omitted.
Super-ships emit ~5g_Co2/Ton/km on average[1], while railway is 2-35g, air transport is 700-3000g and truck transport is 100-2000g. Surprisingly, the bigger the boat the more effective. We tend to have a bias against larger machines, but often they can be the cleanest in proportion. [1] https://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/86...
Why truck transport x20 vary?
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#425This incident has already been added to opening section for the Suez Canal Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Canal I wonder what makes something significant enough to be added to this section. A quick scan of the page shows some interesting tidbits that aren't present in the opening (to me, more noteworthy - so far - than the ongoing blockage): > The canal had an immediate and dramatic effect on worl…
This is a big ship. There's no nearby facility to unload or service it. Its not something you bring tools in your pickup truck to solve the problem. If its not immediately resolvable with the ships own facilities, then its not clear it can be solved in less than a-long-time. Maybe years? Its 200 million pounds. It holds 20,000 units. To unload it would take building a facility on-site. And maybe a rail line to carry…
Sounds like they are digging too.
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#426Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm interested to read about this if you've got links to related blogs or such.
On the logistics business side, I’ll admit that my knowledge is from the day-to-day and don’t read a lot outside of work. Our company does have plenty of marketing material of course: https://www.chrobinson.com/en-us/about-us/technology/robinso... I could ask some of the data science folks I know in the org if they have blogs, I’d be curious about that as well. We have a blog that slowed down during covid (we’ve been…
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#427Pow!
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a big ship. There's no nearby facility to unload or service it. Its not something you bring tools in your pickup truck to solve the problem. If its not immediately resolvable with the ships own facilities, then its not clear it can be solved in less than a-long-time. Maybe years? Its 200 million pounds. It holds 20,000 units. To unload it would take building a facility on-site. And maybe a rail line to carry…
I will eat my hat if this takes a year to resolve, or costs 1 billion dollars (excluding lost revenue due to closure, I have no idea what that is).
Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#429Re: Suez canal blocked by a massive ship
#430Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will eat my hat if this takes a year to resolve, or costs 1 billion dollars (excluding lost revenue due to closure, I have no idea what that is).
It's already costing 18 million dollars a minute