Live data from Hacker News

PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

pine64.com

161–170 of 308 posts

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#161
post #16

Does it allow to call phones and send SMS? This seems like a silly question, but I know that some version of Librem didn't and nobody mentioned it in their reviews.

Yes it does. In some distributions receiving calls was a problem (they slept too deep and woke up too slow).

With Mobian for me it now works stable enough to be used as a daily driver.

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#162
post #85
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> plus an experience that is more attuned to the needs of users than iOS or Android can accomplish that. Why would this project be more effective at doing this than iOS or Android? I don’t see why people other than ideological technologists would want to use this phone. To be clear, I think it’d be great if they did, but I think you’re massively understating the difficulty of challenging iOS and Android. Many compani…

> Why would this project be more effective at doing this than iOS or Android? This is an excellent question. The basic answer is that the incentive structures are different. Apple’s platforms are primarily designed to efficiently deliver commercial software. The app-store, the apis and everything else about their OS ecosystem is designed around the idea that packaged Apps, immutable to the user and remotely maintaine…

I agree that if the “active participant” model somehow became a better fit for most people than the Apple/Google model, it seems like disruption would be possible.

That’s a big “if” though. Curious if you think there are larger trends that would suggest that the current standard of the “walled garden”/closed software model will become less effective than the “active participant” model in meeting the computing needs of everyday people.

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#163
post #20

I personally think that the effort to create open source phones is the single most important technology project going on out there. We have open source browsers, we have open source social apps, but we definitely do not have open source phones. Phones that can be truly owned and controlled by users will reshape the privacy discourse, from one of complaining and legal coercion, to one of choices and markets.

Isn't AOSP fully open source? What is the point of the PinePhone over an Android phone running pure AOSP?

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is still 4 times more expensive than the biggest Pinephone, which of course is a lot more limited in computing power, memory, storage and other areas, but sometimes people just want the bare minimum to enter the world of open phones. I wonder what's the reason behind Purism ignoring the low end market completely.

Purism is paying a team of full-time developers to build software for their devices. Pine64 sells their devices at rock bottom prices and lets the community develop software. I personally would buy the Librem5 if they solved the battery life issues.

In my experience, battery life of the Librem 5 is currently in about 10-16h range depending on usage. Could be better, but it's not as bad as it used to be (and actually easily beats the PinePhone when it comes to active usage time).

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#165
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I must really like down votes because "single most important technology project going on out there" is quite the stretch. Hell, I would argue that over the last year during a pandemic doordash was more important(feeding people while letting them be socially distanced). People on this site like overestimate the avg. persons concern with privacy. the hardware toggles are cool tho.

You commit same error you accuse others off. DoorDash mostly solved problems for a small part of reasonably wealthy people, mostly without families, living in big cities, that don’t cook. You overestimate how your lifestyle isn’t representative of the world.

The only point was that DoorDash probably affected more lives in more positive ways than PinePhone ever will, however little that might be. That's probably accurate.

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s more to the world than USA, for a start. And more than just middle class.

The world absolutely doesn't begin and end with middle class in the USA. But you're just wrong to say "DoorDash mostly solved problems for a small part of reasonably wealthy people, mostly without families, living in big cities". There were times it or a competitor were a godsend for my not-quite-middle-class sister, with five children to feed, who lives in a small city a half hour from Cincinnati.

It’s not exclusively for middle class, sure, but that’s their main target market. It has other users, and it’s great if it’s solving their problems as well.

I’m not diminishing their impact (although I question lots of their business practices). But it’s not the most important tech, by a huge huge margin.

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The "work with the community to merge your software into the repo" model is much better for things that actually help people. So you ratchet up the friction for entry, that helps devs? Say what you want about the app store, but across all the devs for iOS, how many would go through the trouble of self distributing their product? Marketing, infrastructure, payment system etc... ? The app store is a tremendously low…

The benefits go both ways: the community also reaches out to the developers. A lot of software is added to repos without any input from the devs. The plain truth of the matter is that commercial app stores are malware distributors, and community repositories are not. The commercial app store model does not work, at least not for the user. Also: not all software is commercial, and not everyone wants their phones comme…

> not everyone wants their phones commercialized.

While your statement is technically correct, the number of users falling into that category, and would go the extra effort to ensure a non-commercialized day to day phone is usable, is infinitesimally small. Most users embrace the convenience associated with the commercial solution.

This will be a tiny niche phone

Re: PinePhone – Beta Edition Linux SmartPhone Preorder

#170
post #7

> Device Warranty: 30 Days EU Law states two years regardless of manufacturer wishes. https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/gua... => The two-year period starts from the day you received the product: And given it is shipped from Poland, it falls under it.

The website makes the following very clear (not in fine print but right at the beginning of the description). > Beta Limited Edition PinePhones are aimed solely at early adopters. More specifically, only intend for these units to find their way into the hands of users with extensive Linux experience. If you mistake this for a finished phone, I hope regulators will see that Pine64 did due diligence to warn you that th…

Agreed, they make this very clear in multiple different ways:

> core functionality of the PinePhone still an ongoing effort. Thus, the device cannot considered a consumer-ready product.

> DISCLAIMER [...] If you think that a minor dissatisfaction, such as a dead pixel will prompt you to file a PayPal dispute, DO NOT purchase the PinePhone. When fulfilling your purchase, please bear in mind that we are offering the PinePhone at this price as a community service to PINE64 community. Thank you.

This type of device feels just like an extension of what people do in the open source hardware community when a small group gets some custom PCBs made: Someone releases it on a forum, enough people show interest, they decide how many to get made and then one person makes and pays the order and distributes them without really making any money (considering the time they put in you might say they are losing money). That's what this is, just more pieces without you having to do surface mount soldiering.

I mean what do people expect for $150, it's something to buy to hack on.

Post reply on HN