Earlier quoted context omitted.
> c) isn’t sold to or used in any adtech bs What makes you think so? Because the privacy policies you agreed on allows them to (in the the Apple’s Sharing of Personal Data section): >Partners. At times, Apple may partner with third parties to provide services or other offerings. Yes, that's it (there is an “Example” section following, but this is non-binding). Any kind of partner, for any kind of “other offering”. Pa…
The difference, of course, is that if I message someone about an iPhone in messages.app, I'm not inundated with "targeted" ads for phones everywhere I go. Or, if I'm talking to someone about a recipe, my devices don't suddenly start displaying recipes (looking at you, Echo). Anonymized analytics, the type that Apple are informing you about in that document, are fine. Searching the App Store for a productivity app and…
Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
241–250 of 329 posts
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't seem to understand what "I don’t want websites to be able to send notifications to my phone." means.
The point is that you don't represent everybody, yet the browser gives you a choice instead of forcing you to do something.
Chrome should default not to prompt. Safari estimates that no one wants this, and I suspect they’re right.
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#243I love Safari as a browser, but I hate the fact that it neuters the web and makes it feel much less powerful. Web Bluetooth and webUSB are ignored by Safari and unsupported. Notification support is lacking last I checked. No PWA functionality to speak of and webNFC won’t be added. Extensions are lacking largely due to being basically native apps that bring with them all the cost and overhead of being such. As a brows…
Web Bluetooth and webUSB Hard to tell without looking if these things are real or a parody!
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
The default setting for notifications in Chrome is "Sites can ask to send notifications", but you can set that to false in "Preferences > Privacy and security > Site settings > Notifications" and you'll never see the browser popup again. This is a feature that Chrome has had for about 6 years. The fact you haven't discovered it shows Chrome's UX could be better, but the fact you haven't searched for it might alsp sho…
You don't seem to understand what "I don’t want websites to be able to send notifications to my phone." means.
If you turn notifications off for Chrome everywhere you won't see Chrome web notifications anywhere.
If you're talking about some other way websites can send notifications to your phone then I don't think that has anything to do with Chrome. And I can't think of what mechanism you're talking about.
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#245I love Safari as a browser, but I hate the fact that it neuters the web and makes it feel much less powerful. Web Bluetooth and webUSB are ignored by Safari and unsupported. Notification support is lacking last I checked. No PWA functionality to speak of and webNFC won’t be added. Extensions are lacking largely due to being basically native apps that bring with them all the cost and overhead of being such. As a brows…
The only thing I really miss on Safari is a good adblocker. Everything else is fine, I don't use my mobile browser the way I do on desktop.
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't seem to understand what "I don’t want websites to be able to send notifications to my phone." means.
If you block a website sending you Chrome notifications it blocks notifications for all your Chrome installations, including your phone. If you turn notifications off for Chrome everywhere you won't see Chrome web notifications anywhere. If you're talking about some other way websites can send notifications to your phone then I don't think that has anything to do with Chrome. And I can't think of what mechanism you'r…
That is true, but not really relevant to what he said. He didn't say "I wish there was a way to configure my browser to not send notifications to my phone".
You then followed up with a snarky line telling them the thing that bothers them doesn't actually bother them, and that wasn't great either.
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm still struggling to find out the non-cult reason for "the feature must be banned from the browser, just being able to disable it for all time with a single click is not enough".
It'll be the same reason as the "cult" of "what I want should be the norm and anyone who disagrees, for whatever reason, must be in a cult"
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is very reasonable gatekeeping. People would be inundated with notifications on their phones.
No: you would--at worst--be asked more often than you would like to approve notifications for random websites, all of which you would click no on; this feature doesn't just magically cause notifications... hell: it already even exists on desktop Safari and I just click "no".
Re: Safari is now probably the influential wild card browser for user privacy
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don’t get it, 100s of billion of these notifications have been shown already to users on desktop with a less than 1% accept rate. These are spam .
What a weird argument. We're not talking about suspicious blogospam sites asking for notification access here. By the same token, most email sent is spam. Should we stop using email? Spammy notification requests should be mitigated with better browser guards for requesting them. The fact that there is spam does not somehow invalidate that there are legitimate use cases people want them for.