Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. The windows tablets that have been available since the 1990's were simply shit. They were simply a flat screen running windows with a pen. and that idea hasn't changed a bit since windows for pen computing in 1991. Same old windows+a pen interface, and it's absolutely horrible. It wasn't timing, it was simply that Microsoft didn't get that a tablet was something different.
The problem is that a "flat screen running windows with a pen" was the pinacle of what could be brought to market at that time by anyone. Microsoft tried.
For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
151–160 of 176 posts
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
They bought it well before gmail even came around. Hotmail when they bought it was running on top of FreeBSD not Solaris. Microsoft even has an entire document on how they did the migration: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb496985.aspx
Thanks for the link, 1997 &2000, eh? No wonder my recollection is so vague... I notice the article mentions "various unix Systems" then goes on to talk exclusively of the FreeBSD web front end. I still have vague (perhaps 12 year old) memories aout the actual mail storage and management being Sun kit... (mostly from the point of view of a bunch of friends who worked at Sun being outrageously amused at the ballsup of…
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#153Does anyone else feel like the cheers of success for iCloud are a little premature? It's amazing that since it's Apple we automatically believe the "No, really I mean it this time!". Shouldn't previous performance be taken into consideration (.Mac, MobileMe)? Boy who cries cloud? Until iCloud is launched (not til the fall ), all we have is old broken promises, vapourware, and some very expensive data centres. I want…
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#154Microsoft killed their own brand. Through their own efforts, Microsoft means Office, which means corporate. Unsurprisingly, their best consumer success is only tangentially associated with their name. "Microsoft Xbox" sounds like "Accounting Bouncy-house" to most people. There's a little bit of a dissonance when you remember that, yeah, Microsoft made this game system. Even Windows, which is used by a majority of con…
The big problem I have with the "to the cloud" ads is that there's no real call to action, just a vague message that this "cloud" thing seems neat. It shows you a bunch of features under the vague branding of "Windows Live" and "The Cloud", but it's not really clear what you're supposed to buy or download to get them. Are you supposed to run out and buy one of those touch-screen desktops they're showing off to get th…
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the point was about non-obvious features. Lets take the Aero snap feature in Windows 7. How many would know that it is possible to drag a window to the sides and the top etc. and have it snap into place for split screen view or to maximize? Most of the people who know would be either geeks, or someone who saw someone else do it or discovered it by accident. Contrast that to Apple's features, which are demoed…
Give me a break, the only people watching these keynotes are geeks.
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#156Microsoft killed their own brand. Through their own efforts, Microsoft means Office, which means corporate. Unsurprisingly, their best consumer success is only tangentially associated with their name. "Microsoft Xbox" sounds like "Accounting Bouncy-house" to most people. There's a little bit of a dissonance when you remember that, yeah, Microsoft made this game system. Even Windows, which is used by a majority of con…
Well, if they killed their brand they're now resurrecting it. Who does not know of the Xbox? What average family does not want Office on their PC/Mac? Look at the success of Windows7.. and so on..
Average families that don't want Office? Any of them with a Mac. iWork is cheaper, integrates better, and is generally easy to use, plus the templates are much nicer. For the 99% of people who use 1% of Office's features, iWork is more than 'good enough', it's 'much better'.
Windows 7 was a success because Vista was junk and XP is ten years old and showing its age. It's a good OS, but people are buying it because XP just isn't good enough anymore and it's Windows 7 or Mac OS X.
Microsoft's brand is hurting because they don't have a cohesive strategy for the things they do. They've launched two separate mobile phone platforms in the last few years; one of which was cancelled almost immediately after launch, and the other, while extremely promising, is floundering in the market so far.
Microsoft needs serious top-down leadership, not middle-outwards leadership, and until they get that, their brand is going to continue to suffer.
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's nothing wrong with MobileMe or .Mac (they both have bad names -- thats the biggest issue) They weren't huge sweeping successes because they didn't have enough features and cost a LOT. But the features they did have worked well. MobileMe was just .Mac rebranded with more features. iCloud is just MobileMe rebranded with more features. Apple is smart for recognizing when they need to rebrand for communication fa…
Steve Jobs apparently thinks (Or thought) there was something wrong with them.
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#158The problem for Microsoft is that they continue to serve two masters: consumer users and corporate users. Corporate IT shops, especially within certain industries, can be exceptionally wary of anything that moves data outside their walls. Consumers are in general not nearly so picky. Corporations are MS's biggest customers and for years have had considerable influence on product direction. It's just not in Microsoft'…
I'm sure Apple's considered it, but I doubt they see enough of a market in the product to bother packaging it up and selling it. It's obvious that they're not incredibly interested in the server or high-end enterprise market, and they're perfectly content to let their Activesync integration carry them for now.
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
> vapourware There's a beta. Register and download it.
How exactly do I get this beta? I have tried, updated iTunes and my iPhone, but see nothing. Do I need iOS5 to be able to use it, which I would need a developer account to get access to?
Re: For Google, iCloud Is Annoying; For Microsoft, It's A Humiliation
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
> vapourware There's a beta. Register and download it.
How exactly do I get this beta? I have tried, updated iTunes and my iPhone, but see nothing. Do I need iOS5 to be able to use it, which I would need a developer account to get access to?