Live data from Hacker News

Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

bbc.com

421–428 of 428 posts

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Twitter hosts their own servers rather than agreeing to another company's terms of service.

Twitter uses AWS. You are probably thinking of Facebook https://www.techradar.com/news/twitter-signs-up-aws-for-its-...

Twitter will use AWS, is what your article says?

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#422
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sebastian and Linus Media Group seem to be pretty frank and open about a lot of this: see for instance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzRGBAUz5mA&list=PL8mG-RkN2u... on putting up gurning thumbnails and navigating the YT algorithm (and that whole playlist, including a revenue breakdown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t73wXF8IF-8&list=PL8mG-RkN2u... ), the Gamers Nexus video on LTT's production process https://www.yo…

I wonder how many potential views he loses due to his gurning? I've never watched any of his videos despite YT constantly recommending them to me because I've got a personal rule about never clicking on a thumbnail that has a picture of someone pulling a face or which has a clickbait title.

LTT actually A/B tested this and found out that pulling a face with the item in front + grabby title WAY outperformed the alternative.

Which is crap, but that's the world we live in. They do excellent content nevertheless. LTT and MKBHD are the only two tech review style Youtubers I bother following. They get to the point, know their shit and speak calmly.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Linus Tech Tips is essentially the "Top Gear of Tech" - it's over the top, hammed up, but eminently watchable and there are plenty of nuggets of useful information.

It's more watchable than Top Gear for me. Maybe LTT employs better actors but in any case I believe in its candid elements more. On Top Gear it's completely obvious it's all scripted but we're expected to believe it's not. I find it very annoying and quite uncomfortable to watch.

They did Lampshade[1] the supposed scripting in an episode of Grand Tour[2]. They've got a huge crew and lots of stuff, so going over borders is a huge hassle without extensive preparation. Basically it needs to be scripted to some point to work at all.

[1] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LampshadeHanging [2] S2E4, Unscripted: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6068870/

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#424
post #151

This article is a little on the surface level, but it's true. People were screaming about where platforms and digital sharecropping was headed all along... and we're here now. Youtube, which is basically digital free-to-air is even more centralised than old free to air. Youtube really is an extreme situation. They really dominate a whole medium single handedly and youtubers have shockingly little power in the whole t…

It's just incredibly hard to compete with Youtube. In a way that's Google's greatest achievement: they convinced everybody that they're entitled to host and stream 4K videos forever not only for free, but the creators get a share of the ad revenue despite fronting none of the hosting costs. It's an incredibly good deal. The amount of infrastructure and human resources required to merely keep a system like Youtube run…

This is also the reason why every potential 5 minute read time blog post is turned into a 30 minute monotonous video.

Monetising. Youtube does it automatically, with a blog you need to manage the ads yourself and the audience is a lot smaller.

There is also a generational gap at some point. To me, it seems that 20-somethings turn to Youtube for every issue (phone setup, toilet clogged whatever) instead of looking for a text resource.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#425

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Floatplane as a platform for the most part doesn't dictate what that content is other than it being in the format of a video. Do they allow, say, porn, or white nationalist videos? I'm always curious exactly where platforms set the bounds.

This seems like a vague prohibition: > Do not post false or misleading information Depending on how this is interpreted/enforced, it could make the platform much more or much less attractive to politically-oriented creators.

Some things are easily proven false, like anti-vaxxers or climate change denial. Or even flat earthers.

The gray area for false/misleading information isn't as large as people would think.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#426
post #403
post #282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh I don't agree. I think there are downsides to putting a 'mod' tag beside usernames, quite strong downsides actually, in addition to the upside that you guys are correctly noting. It's a tradeoff. I'm glad that I listened to my intuition 7 years ago (ack) when I became responsible for HN, and chose to trust the way things had always functioned here. I don't see this as RTFM; there's no FM to begin with, other than…

> Oh I don't agree. I think there are downsides to putting a 'mod' tag beside usernames, quite strong downsides actually What are those 'downsides....quite strong downsides actually'?

It would change the feeling in the community. It would introduce barriers in communication that would make it harder to relate. It would fuck with the psychology of both moderators and non-moderators, the same way that uniforms do. It would turn the mods into abstractions/roles rather than human beings. It would infect HN with that priggish approach to authority which appeals to the smallminded and depresses creativity. It would signal lack of trust. It would demoralize any moderator who didn't have the soul of a meter maid.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#427

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Twitter uses AWS. You are probably thinking of Facebook https://www.techradar.com/news/twitter-signs-up-aws-for-its-...

Twitter will use AWS, is what your article says?

The article was from last year. It does not say when they will move and there is no update saying they have already moved. If they have not already moved they will be shortly. Other articles say they will be using AWS in 2021.

Regardless, from the sound of it Twitter was working with Amazon on this integration. This means Amazon knew Twitter was at least planning on migrating. If Amazon was serious about being consistent they should have told Twitter right there and then that they would not be allowed on AWS since they violate AWS' terms of services in the same way Parler does.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#428
post #326
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's just incredibly hard to compete with Youtube. In a way that's Google's greatest achievement: they convinced everybody that they're entitled to host and stream 4K videos forever not only for free, but the creators get a share of the ad revenue despite fronting none of the hosting costs. It's an incredibly good deal. The amount of infrastructure and human resources required to merely keep a system like Youtube run…

Please everyone don’t forget google search positioning too. This is massive. Google have pushed YouTube into their search for a long time, basically building YouTube doing it. That brought insane traffic to YouTube videos and makes YouTube the place for videos. THIS is the antitrust of google, and where authorities should strike them. They built a video platform and destroyed others using their 90% market power in an…

Are you sure about this? Search on Bing, they show as many YouTube results as Google, if not more.
Post reply on HN