Earlier quoted context omitted.
why is it a poor way to communicate anything useful? if sending someone a dollar through venmo costs $0.0000001 worth of electricity and sending someone a dollar through the bitcoin network costs $1 doesn't that communicate everything you need to know?
Probably because twice the amount of transactions do require as much energy as half of the amount of transactions or as much energy as no transactions at all, i.e. Bitcoin's energy usage depends on the difficulty of mining a block which is not affected by the number of transactions in a block.
Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
281–290 of 862 posts
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
why is it a poor way to communicate anything useful? if sending someone a dollar through venmo costs $0.0000001 worth of electricity and sending someone a dollar through the bitcoin network costs $1 doesn't that communicate everything you need to know?
Probably because twice the amount of transactions do require as much energy as half of the amount of transactions or as much energy as no transactions at all, i.e. Bitcoin's energy usage depends on the difficulty of mining a block which is not affected by the number of transactions in a block.
Only if the transactions do not have any fee. If they have a transaction fee, this indirectly increases the difficulty of mining future blocks (since the miners get more Bitcoin per block, they can use more energy per block before their expected net return is negative, and they are incentivized to do so through competition with other miners; the Bitcoin difficulty adjustment then notices the increase in hash rate and increases the difficulty).
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
No one here is arguing for replacement of military force, your brain got stuck by a common fallacy it seems. Notice how displacing some military force usage by changing the motivation or capability for intervention (for example to maintain a currency advantage) might be in itself a Good Thing (tm) and how it does not require replacing armed forces entirely.
"You get a choice between bitcoin mining and military force" That was literally a quote from the post being responded to.
Bitcoin doesn't solve, for example, hate crimes or something like this.
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the cause of many of humanity's biggest problems is humans As opposed to elephants or sea urchins? How can humans not be the cause humanity's biggest problems? The Buddha taught there are three kinds of dukkha [usually translated as “suffering”]. The first kind is physical and mental pain from the inevitable stresses of life like old age, sickness, and death. The second is the distress we feel as a result of imperm…
i suspect the assertion was thought of as "nowadays", whereas 150 years ago infectious disease might have been humanity's biggest problem.
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#285get a tor browser and discover monero being used in the wild.
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#286Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#287Bitcoin will see considerably less use once we end our insane 'war on drugs'.
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#288Bitcoin is an almost perfect exploitation of humanities fatal flaws (greed, unwillingness to acknowledge externalities - i.e. selfishness). It's that old SF-trope that the cause of many of humanity's biggest problems is humans.
This is silly. Consensus (probably, I am doubtful of PoS) isn't free. You get a choice between bitcoin mining and military force. Which do you find less harmful? Edit: I should clarify. I am saying that the status of the USD as a reserve currency has led to lots of US military action.
Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#289Re: Bill Gates Says that Bitcoin is bad For the Planet
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
How many times has this been used in practice? Like really - did your friend owe you $200 and you wanted to make sure he couldn't pay you something over square and then call his credit company and say his card was lost? Like are you a shop online and you wanted to make sure ALL of your customers are paying in Bitcoin so they can't claim someone stole their card? Are you a party to a lawsuit and the judge decided to o…
Security is not usually the main use case of a service, but a necessary feature of one. Bitcoin can do many things, and its main use case right now is store of wealth, so with your examples you've demonstrated you don't understand its most basic function. When you notice that multi billion dollar transactions of Bitcoin are made every blue moon you might not be scoffing at what its security protocol is providing it.