Live data from Hacker News

Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

bbc.com

251–260 of 428 posts

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow that's extremely fucked up. He's right, nobody should have that power. If they do have that power, we should take it away from them.

He kicked it off of cloudflare, not the internet

They were successfully censored from the internet for quite some time. I believe they were only available through the onion. They must've burned through like two dozens of domains at this point.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#252
post #207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're underestimating the ability of HN readers to figure things out. Perhaps that is the answer to both questions.

This equivalent of "RTFM" is a hostile percept for communication, as it implies that it is right to hide or obfuscate relevant information so that the speaker has less of a job to do when producing clear speech. There are benefits to "RTFM". They may involve making sure there are shared assumptions during speech that allow further speech to be economized equitably between speaker and receiver. They may involve the in…

> it really shouldn't be the job of the audience to figure anything out in the first place

Words to avoid living by.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's really screwed up. Do you have more details? More examples?

With the help of Algolia's HN search, I was able to find the story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21671579 Apparently an organization called Shadowserver (a nonprofit security organization) claimed that the blog was part of the control system for a botnet, and the domain was transferred out of the registrant's control with no due process. They got it back, but the fact that such a thing is even possible in the…

Thanks for the details.

> Domain names ought to be property, and like any other property should be protected against arbitrary seizure by courts of law.

I completely agree. Some group saying the domain is associated with malware shouldn't be enough to cause it to be seized. They should have to actually prove it in court.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#254
post #233

> Linus Sebastian Something to understand, for those who might have just seen some youtube videos of him being goofy, is that he's an actor . The guy on camera doing stupid stuff is a stage persona. It's an intentionally cultivated image and media persona to get as many video views as possible. I sort of see him as one possible aspect of the low/medium budget TV production stuff which is common in his home city, Vanc…

Sebastian and Linus Media Group seem to be pretty frank and open about a lot of this: see for instance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzRGBAUz5mA&list=PL8mG-RkN2u... on putting up gurning thumbnails and navigating the YT algorithm (and that whole playlist, including a revenue breakdown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t73wXF8IF-8&list=PL8mG-RkN2u... ), the Gamers Nexus video on LTT's production process https://www.yo…

TIL the word "gurn". Never once heard it before and even just now autocorrect tried to insist it was "turn". The description is indeed apt for what I see in a lot of thumbnails.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurn

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#255
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow that's extremely fucked up. He's right, nobody should have that power. If they do have that power, we should take it away from them.

> Wow that's extremely fucked up. He's right, nobody should have that power. If they do have that power, we should take it away from them. I agree. We should make the government use its monopoly on force to take freedoms away from people we disagree with. How dare a company decide with whom it does business and under what terms?

Domain name registrars aren't normal companies. They're more like a government institution. The government can't refuse to recognize the fact I own my house just because they don't like my political opinions. Why should it be any different with internet domain names?

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#256
post #70

I follow CGP Grey’s stuff and it’s been interesting and instructive to see how he diversified. * His Youtube channel is his main platform * However, the money mostly comes from patreon subscribers, and you can also have videos delivered there * He also earns income from a podcast, Cortex * The Podcast has its own brand of sellable things, currently journals and Tshirts * He had a second podcast, hello internet, curre…

Also he has a channel on Nebula, a streaming service set up as a clear hedge against YouTube doing bad things. He was one of the driving forces behind Nebula, but I believe he is no longer involved in running it.

I thought he started standard.tv, or did that become Nebula?

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#257
post #153
post #70

I follow CGP Grey’s stuff and it’s been interesting and instructive to see how he diversified. * His Youtube channel is his main platform * However, the money mostly comes from patreon subscribers, and you can also have videos delivered there * He also earns income from a podcast, Cortex * The Podcast has its own brand of sellable things, currently journals and Tshirts * He had a second podcast, hello internet, curre…

CGP Grey is strange, so to say. He effectively abandoned Hello Internet. They once mentioned that they have 900K subs. Grey fully controlled HI, and it was way more popular than Cortex. If he wants to diversify so much abandoning project like this just doesn’t make sense. Also he has no basic decency to announce cancelation and left Tims hanging, for many of whom it was the podcast.

He's probably quite wealthy and established already. It doesn't strike me as strange that he might burn out on some projects and not feel as motivated to continue as someone with no online profile.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#258
post #198

a good story about floatplane: i signed up pretty much as soon as it was announced, then i forgot about it and also forgot my password. i was billed -very little- for a while then i opened a support ticket to have my account restored, since i had been billed for a while i at least wanted to watch some content. but apparently something in the backend had changed and they plainly refunded me from the time i had my last…

Can you imagine Google doing such a thing? I'm chuckling just thinking about how improbable that would be.

This is why those services as so necessary.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#259
Funnily I'm subscribed to Corridor Digital and Nebula. These were the first things I thought about when I saw the headline. And now I know where Luke from LTT went and why despite "not working at LTT anymore", Linus seemed to have a good relationship with Luke whenever he appeared.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The general "danger" of old videos comes more from people digging up what was said and causing a shitstorm because of it, rather than Youtube themselves going out of their way to delete channels because of old videos. If people want to dig through your old videos and want to cause a shitstorm, self-hosting isn't going to protect you.

I don’t like a lot of the things being done by people who get deplatformed, but honestly I think there should be protections against cutting people off. Before the internet, I never worried about not being able to use the postal service or making a phone call. But now I worry about something stupid happening that obliterates my online life because Google decides to nuke my account.

Start moving to as many non-Google servies as possible. Some things are hard to replace, some aren't.
Post reply on HN