Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is so cool, I didn‘t know about these yet and I‘d call myself a space buff... Speaking of flight and picking the nits here — looks like Wikipedia also isn‘t completely correct here: > It is planned to make the first powered flight on any planet beyond Earth ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance
> ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance Not the Apollo 11 lunar module? In contrast to the sky cranes it actually lifted off again.
The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
121–130 of 265 posts
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is so cool, I didn‘t know about these yet and I‘d call myself a space buff... Speaking of flight and picking the nits here — looks like Wikipedia also isn‘t completely correct here: > It is planned to make the first powered flight on any planet beyond Earth ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance
> ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance Not the Apollo 11 lunar module? In contrast to the sky cranes it actually lifted off again.
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#123Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#124Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon
A balloon is barely an aircraft
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the fascinating things about space silicon is that NASA spends many years hardening specific processors to withstand the types of shocks and electromagnetic interference from space travel. These intensive processes mean that the equipment they can use is always 10-20 years behind the modern equivalents.
and yet they are fine with using a snapdragon arm processor on the helicopter?
Source: https://orbitalindex.com/archive/2021-02-24-Issue-105/#ingen...
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Smaller transistors also have a smaller cross-section so for the same number of transistors this somewhat cancels out.
But then you have to build for redundancy rather than just performance (say, sacrifice some floor-plan to error correction, recovery, circuit duplication, etc...)
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#127Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon
If we understand "flight" as being the use of a wing to generate lift in an atmosphere, then I think we can safely say this is the first time we have flown on another planet. I assume this little helicopter actually has rotary wings rather than fans.
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#128Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon
If we understand "flight" as being the use of a wing to generate lift in an atmosphere, then I think we can safely say this is the first time we have flown on another planet. I assume this little helicopter actually has rotary wings rather than fans.
The first flight was in 1903, not 300 BC China when they used sky lanterns.
Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
Between the two. 30 µSv per hour on the surface of Mars on average compared to 60 µSv on the Moon - compared to 5 µSv on a jet. Not friendly, but not too awful.
Or 0.5 per hour on Earth at sea level. That's only 2 orders of magnitude difference. Given that we don't expect radiation damage to be a major source of failures in Earthbound consumer or commercial electronics, it's a bit surprising it's such a big deal in space.