Live data from Hacker News

The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

universetoday.com

91–100 of 265 posts

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aren't smaller transistor sizes also more susceptible to radiation issues which means you can't really use newer processors without ever more effort in radiation hardening?

Smaller transistors also have a smaller cross-section so for the same number of transistors this somewhat cancels out.

But then you have to build for redundancy rather than just performance (say, sacrifice some floor-plan to error correction, recovery, circuit duplication, etc...)

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In general the older nodes work better for radiation and other cosmic forces. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening That's why they don't use the latest and greatest in the space.

They work better primarily because they had previously invested in the tooling to rad-harden them and it’s really expensive to do that again one time for each mission; cheaper to rely on already-rad-hardened designs.

Not necessarily; physical size matters a lot.

Just an example: consider you were to add some extra electrical charge to the gate of a transistor (from an electron or ion beam, I don't know).

A larger transistor has a higher gate capacitance, it is therefore quite immune against a few extra charges. On smaller transistors, though, it could dramatically increase the voltage, leading to a bit error, or destroying the transistor. Capacitance in this case is proportional to the area.

Higher density also has some inherent drawbacks against particles, since a damaged part is proportionately more damaged if it is smaller.

More ancient processes are also higher-voltage, and higher-current, so they can handle a lot more noise on these signals.

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#94
post #23

One of the things I find really cool about Ingenuity is how it is in large based on consumer hardware. The main processor is a Snapdragon 801 running Linux which communicates with Perseverance using the Zigbee protocol [1]. Perseverance on the other hand uses a RAD750 from 2001! If successful I hope this can lead to more modern hardware for these kinds of missions in general. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingenui…

The problem is that NASA is designed around long term and expensive projects. At one point, a fast iterating company like space-x will surpass their achievements.

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#95
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As the name RAD750 indicates, that processor is designed to be radiation hardened which matters for longer missions. I doubt the Snapdragon 801 will survive as long or have as few errors but it also doesn't matter since Ingenuity isn't aimed for long term usage.

One thing that's not clear to me is what the radiation is like on mars. Mars has an atmosphere, but no magnetic field. Is it like the situation high in earth's atmosphere (like using your ipad on a commercial flight), or would it be more like on the moon with no protection?

Between the two. 30 µSv per hour on the surface of Mars on average compared to 60 µSv on the Moon - compared to 5 µSv on a jet. Not friendly, but not too awful.

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#96

Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon

This is so cool, I didn‘t know about these yet and I‘d call myself a space buff...

Speaking of flight and picking the nits here — looks like Wikipedia also isn‘t completely correct here:

> It is planned to make the first powered flight on any planet beyond Earth

...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In general the older nodes work better for radiation and other cosmic forces. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening That's why they don't use the latest and greatest in the space.

Can't all of the radiation issues be mitigated with proper shielding of the electronics?

It's trickier than it seems because some forms of radiation can induce different kinds of radiation when they hit the dense shielding so you're kind of back to square one in that you still need a radiation resistant processor.

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#98

Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon

This is so cool, I didn‘t know about these yet and I‘d call myself a space buff... Speaking of flight and picking the nits here — looks like Wikipedia also isn‘t completely correct here: > It is planned to make the first powered flight on any planet beyond Earth ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance

It seems that rocket propulsion does not count as “powered flight”

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#99
post #46

Does anyone know why they chose to send a helicopter and not some kind of plane or glider? I would've thought that a fixed-wing aircraft would have been simpler, lighter, faster and more efficient.

How many runways do you see on Mars

UAVs on Earth commonly launch on catapults and not runways.

Re: The Mars Helicopter Is Online and Getting Ready to Fly

#100

Fun fact: This is not the first time a space program has flown on another planet. The Soviets launched weather balloons on Venus during the Venera missions [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_program#Balloon

This is so cool, I didn‘t know about these yet and I‘d call myself a space buff... Speaking of flight and picking the nits here — looks like Wikipedia also isn‘t completely correct here: > It is planned to make the first powered flight on any planet beyond Earth ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance

> ...arguably the first _powered_ flights were done by the sky cranes of Opportunity and Perseverance

Not the Apollo 11 lunar module? In contrast to the sky cranes it actually lifted off again.

Post reply on HN