Live data from Hacker News

Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

techcrunch.com

181–190 of 214 posts

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They didn't try with me. They didn't try with any of my friends. I think they're trying with the wrong crowd. Interesting side thought here (at least to me). MS has traditionally done very well selling to the larger enterprise market. As the headcount in those orgs go down, will MS' influence drop? Newer people coming in will probably have come from smaller orgs where MS is less prevalent, and when there's overall fe…

They probably are - I agree. They should make personal licenses cheap and ubiquitous therefore creating mindset. Most smaller orgs just buy machines and live with what is on them these days and only tech-focused companies seem to care what they run. The entire NHS (UK's free health system) seems to run on Windows 2000 and XP quite happily still because that's what the machines came with at the time.

As long as you can upgrade the browser, OS probably doesn't matter for many organizations.

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#182
post #153

> Resize from any edge You can now resize a window from any side or corner. Interesting that they did finally do this. And without adding huge-ass borders to everything...

If they added borders to everything, how many pixels do the borders take up? I'll probably avoid the upgrade if there are borders I can't get rid of...

Other way around. It was a combination of "oh, that's nice, people have been requesting that for years" combined with a bit of snark at Window's ever-increasing border size - which people often defend by saying that you need the borders to resize / know where the edge of the application is. I cry foul, and now I have more ammo :)

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#183

>This isn’t actually the first time Apple has offered an OS upgrade at a steep discount compared to its Windows rival (which typically runs over $100) — Snow Leopard made its debut at $29. A pretty flawed apples to oranges comparison. OS X is more similar to bios updates... you buy the hardware, the vendor makes money off it and gives away the software. With Microsoft, you're paying the OEM money for the hardware(wit…

I have 10.5 and held off on purchasing 10.6 because I was waiting for 10.7. It bums me out that now I'll need to purchase both 10.6 and 10.7, regardless of how much the Windows upgrades cost. Judging from some of the tweets & comments I'm seeing elsewhere, a lot of other consumers are bummed too.

You could wait until iTunes becomes incompatible with 10.5 and Apple will give you a free OS upgrade. (assuming they continue this policy in the no-PC required to activate iOS devices future)

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#184

>This isn’t actually the first time Apple has offered an OS upgrade at a steep discount compared to its Windows rival (which typically runs over $100) — Snow Leopard made its debut at $29. A pretty flawed apples to oranges comparison. OS X is more similar to bios updates... you buy the hardware, the vendor makes money off it and gives away the software. With Microsoft, you're paying the OEM money for the hardware(wit…

>"Windows 7 may not be upgradeable directly from XP without a format"

So long as there is an available bootable partition/disk - you can install Windows 7 and leave the XP installation intact and create a dual boot system. It's not something Microsoft tries to explain to the average consumer, but it's pretty much painless.

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#185

Not sure why below comment is dead. The account seems ok and not hell banned. Was it flagged to death? If so, anyone who flagged it,why? dsplittgerber 24 minutes ago | link [dead] Anyone else surprised by how many hugely popular apps Apple is going to kill with new Lion/iOS? Instapaper built-into Safari now, all kinds of messanger apps killed by iMessage, some of those photo apps going down the drain as well, Reminde…

That is sharecropping. If you play on another corporation's turf, expect this to happen and expect your income to be destroyed with zero days notice.

So you should create your own smartphone?

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#186
After all the talk about delta updates in the keynote I had hoped that Time Machine would be doing file deltas now. A read through the Lion features page doesn't turn anything up. Anyone know?

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Speaking from Australia, I'll assume that at least iinet will have it on their cap-less servers to download. For example most major Steam games are and don't count against the cap.

Interesting...in the case of Steam, does the ISP run that server, or do they just whitelist the Steam server IP?

As far as I know it's the ISP which has a cache of it, so I just download from the local server.

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#188
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> example produce a view by specific composers then a view by performers. Is this really common? I might be out of touch, but I doubt anyone really uses this.

Maybe not that specific example, but the situation of listening to Indian film music is a classic case of folders being 100% inadequate. Any given Indian movie corresponds to an 'album' of songs. However, each song can in the album have a different set of artistes associated with it. Hell, sometimes there are multiple composers within the same movie's soundtrack. And Indian movie soundtracks are more tightly coupled…

I don't understand... do you not typically want to listen to the soundtrack in the order it was in the movie (that is, exactly the case in which a single folder for the soundtrack excels)? If not, how?

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#189
post #186

After all the talk about delta updates in the keynote I had hoped that Time Machine would be doing file deltas now. A read through the Lion features page doesn't turn anything up. Anyone know?

Time Machine has always done deltas (unless I have no idea what you're talking about?)

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe not that specific example, but the situation of listening to Indian film music is a classic case of folders being 100% inadequate. Any given Indian movie corresponds to an 'album' of songs. However, each song can in the album have a different set of artistes associated with it. Hell, sometimes there are multiple composers within the same movie's soundtrack. And Indian movie soundtracks are more tightly coupled…

I don't understand... do you not typically want to listen to the soundtrack in the order it was in the movie (that is, exactly the case in which a single folder for the soundtrack excels)? If not, how?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN