Live data from Hacker News

Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

techcrunch.com

161–170 of 214 posts

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#161

any news on whether it is for 64-bit processors ONLY? my core-solo mac mini wants to know :-S

Lion is 64-bit only. Although the early minis have socketed CPUs, so you could theoretically replace it with a Core 2: http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/systems/mac_mini_core_2_duo_swaps...

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#162
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are quite common things which are impossible or rather clumsy to do with folders, for example produce a view by specific composers then a view by performers. Can not be done with folders unless suffer large amount of duplicates. If you listen to your music in a rigid way where folders works fine then obviously iTunes and other music management software are of no use to you. But you are not typical.

> example produce a view by specific composers then a view by performers. Is this really common? I might be out of touch, but I doubt anyone really uses this.

In classical music listeners, yes.

If you are into pop music, there are easy examples as well. Sometimes I need all the dance music, other times I only want dance music that are retro, or dance music from certain group etc. Folders will never be as flexible.

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#163

Hallelujah! "OS X Lion [Terminal] includes editable ANSI colors in preferences and support for 256 colors and BCE (background color erase). The default TERM value is xterm-256color." Cite: http://www.apple.com/macosx/whats-new/features.html#unix

Full-screen terminal is [sadly] the only feature I really want in this update.

The update is going to include full-screen terminal.

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#164
post #59

Oh come on apple now we have to do everything through your stores?

This is not a total change in direction for Apple, just a fleshing out of what they've been wanting to do for a while. Expect more of this in the future, not less.

And seeing how I now first need to order physical disks to upgrade to Snow Leopard in order to get this latest release, I kinda reflect back and wish they had done this sooner :-)

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#165
"Auto setup for Gmail and Yahoo! in Mail[.app]

When you first log in to your Google, Yahoo!, or AOL accounts in Safari, you’ll have the option to use them with Mail, iCal, Address Book, iChat, and other applications on your Mac."

Thats pretty smart to keep Mail.app relevant in the web age! (I hope it handles "guest" logins on the web gracefully though!)

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#167

Hallelujah! "OS X Lion [Terminal] includes editable ANSI colors in preferences and support for 256 colors and BCE (background color erase). The default TERM value is xterm-256color." Cite: http://www.apple.com/macosx/whats-new/features.html#unix

Well that only took a decade..

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#169
post #151
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On Unix systems you can replace files on disk without issues because of the way it does reference counting to the underlying file system. Unlike Windows where this is not possible. I am better there is still one single reboot to start up the new kernel and whatnot. Although I can't find any details on it.

The reason why you can replace executables on Unix is because unix loads the entire file before executing where as Windows does not need to do this, hence executables are opened with out FILE_SHARE_DELETE which would allow you to delete the file while it's open on Windows. If you create a file and open it with FILE_SHARE_DELETE you can delete it while it's in use. This has absolutely nothing to do with the underlying…

There is no requirement for UNIX to "load the entire file before executing," nor does the deletion of files on disk have anything to do with whether or not a file is executable. Under UNIX, any file which has been opened will be accessible until it is closed, regardless of whether or not the file has been deleted (the number of hard links for the inode drops to zero, in UNIX parlance).

For a more technical explanation see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inode

Re: Mac OS X Lion: Coming In July For $29

#170
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are quite common things which are impossible or rather clumsy to do with folders, for example produce a view by specific composers then a view by performers. Can not be done with folders unless suffer large amount of duplicates. If you listen to your music in a rigid way where folders works fine then obviously iTunes and other music management software are of no use to you. But you are not typical.

> example produce a view by specific composers then a view by performers. Is this really common? I might be out of touch, but I doubt anyone really uses this.

Maybe not that specific example, but the situation of listening to Indian film music is a classic case of folders being 100% inadequate.

Any given Indian movie corresponds to an 'album' of songs. However, each song can in the album have a different set of artistes associated with it. Hell, sometimes there are multiple composers within the same movie's soundtrack. And Indian movie soundtracks are more tightly coupled than "Western" movie OST albums, so you can't just treat them as an independent collection of songs either. (Indians typically identify songs first with the movies they appeared in, rather than the composer or performer)

Basically, a majority of Indian movies are musicals - and a simple folder structure is just not enough to deal with such a collection of music!

Post reply on HN