Live data from Hacker News

17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

bugzilla.mozilla.org

141–150 of 281 posts

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry not sure what you mean? This is exactly how Safari, Chrome, and I guess others I can't immediately test work. Seems good to work as expected from other browsers?

They're saying, I think, that the textbox which is a URL is a special textbox but it shouldn't be. It should be the same as any other textbox in Firefox.

^the same as any text box on any OS since Mac Classic and perhaps before on the Xerox.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, and that's cool. I get being consistent with other browsers. I also miss being able to invert the choice with an about:config toggle. I also know that I'm in the minority, and that maybe the size of my cohort is too small to add yet another thing to check during regression testing. But I'm still mad about it :) Firefox always seemed like the browser for people who want to configure weird things, or extend it in…

Yeah they can't really win - do they try to keep happy a dwindling group who liked Firefox the way it was in the past, or simplify and streamline to innovate more quickly appeal to new users. It's probably impossible to do both. I'm firmly in the anti-customisation camp myself. They obviously aren't ever going to appeal to both of us.

It is possible to do both. The answer is customization, about:config already exists.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#143
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's interesting. In my case, I hardly edit urls manually in the address bar. Usually I end up on a site either by clicking on links or copying and pasting a whole url from elsewhere. So, when I click on the address bar it's almost always to copy that url. Exception may be if you are front end dev testing different paths on the browser in which case editing in the address bar could be common.

I forgot about that use case. I paste into and copy from the address bar all the time. But I still get myself sideways because I treat it like any other text box, and end up de -selecting the URL and having to try again! You'd think after so long, I'd get used to the behavior and just single-click it. But apparently Pavlov would have me culled from his experiment :)

Time doesn't matter, because you probably interacts with many more normal text fields than browsers URL fields. And since they look the same, and act mostly the same, you won't learn to handle it correctly.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#145
post #45

One of the most voted for issues is closed WONTFIX: single click selects all in address bar and search box. I use Firefox exclusively and this is the single most annoying change they made for no apparent reason. So annoying. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621570 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?votes=133

I just laughed when I saw your comment, and the bugzilla links are styled as "visted" (i.e. gray instead of black.) I hate that behavior. When I click in the address bar, it's because I want to edit the URL. If I want to go somewhere else, I'll open a new tab, or use a bookmark, or click a link on a page. In the rare case that I want to type a whole new URL, but keep the same tab, I can easily triple-click or [Cmd]+A…

most of the time if I click there it's to copy/paste it somewhere else, and I'm pretty sure most people use it the same way.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#146
post #45

One of the most voted for issues is closed WONTFIX: single click selects all in address bar and search box. I use Firefox exclusively and this is the single most annoying change they made for no apparent reason. So annoying. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621570 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?votes=133

Interesting, I've always loved this feature. I guess in my use cases, whenever I go to click the URL bar I'm intending to copy/paste it more often than edit. Either way, it's deeply ingrained into my muscle memory by now to go click -> pause -> click to edit.

Ctrl+L/F6 already supports that use case and more quickly since you'll need to paste or edit.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#147
post #45

One of the most voted for issues is closed WONTFIX: single click selects all in address bar and search box. I use Firefox exclusively and this is the single most annoying change they made for no apparent reason. So annoying. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621570 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?votes=133

> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?votes=133

No longer shows up here, because it's now 135 votes.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#148
post #115
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good timing! I actually fixed this 21 year old feature request: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52821 You can set browser.quitShortcut.disabled=true in about config starting with Firefox 87.

Whoa, that is incredible, thank you SO MUCH! I don't think I can explain the extent to which this simple papercut has been vicious and painful to me. So many times, I've started writing some long post in a text field and accidentally lost it due to pressing some wrong keyboard shortcut (oops, you pressed backspace outside a text field! oops, we bound this key to 'reload the page', oops you closed the form by pressing…

> So many times, I've started writing some long post in a text field and accidentally lost it due to pressing some wrong keyboard shortcut (oops, you pressed backspace outside a text field! oops, we bound this key to 'reload the page', oops you closed the form by pressing ESC!).

For me it's often ctrl+w to delete one word, which terminals have gotten me used to. I don't want the shortcut removed because I use it all the time to close tabs outside a text box, but it also still working while focused in one is annoying.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like it should be user configurable, because I agree with you that selecting the whole thing by default is annoying.

Unfortunately user-configurability seems to be a out of fashion these days.

Firefox, despite the impression that HN might give, is still very configurable. The existence of about:config means Mozilla can add options without cluttering the more accessible preferences menu. I'm perfectly happy with the default behavior of selecting everything by default, but it does seem like the sort of thing that would be nice to make configurable by those who are willing to mess with about:config.

Re: 17 year old Firefox feature request fixed

#150
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

UGH the recent Chrome update also adds on top of this if you select then hit left arrow it doesn't even go to start it starts after https:// soooo annoying I don't remember it doing that before but maybe i have a bad memory

Huh, just tried that on Chrome/macOS on Reddit and it actually went to the end of the www, no less. So news.ycombinator.com it goes to the right of https:// and www.reddit.com it goes to the right of https://www . Madness.

Google's (standardised![1]) destruction of the URL in action.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20574210

Personally, my preferred way of displaying a URL and interacting with it is a full, unmolested URL, in a regular UI edit control.

Post reply on HN