Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would be prevent them from voting or force them to abstain? He doesn't have the power to do that. Also, back-bench MPs speak on behalf of their constituencies more than on behalf of the government.
The party whip has that power; the threat is to lose access to committee appointments, cabinet positions, or to even be kicked from the party. Or simply to have the party not adequately fund your re-election campaign.
Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
151–160 of 191 posts
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#152When I posted about two countries pressuring tech companies into silencing oppressed communities (including one country credibly accused of genocide) [1] it was flagged for being “political”.
But China bad. Whatever fits your agenda I guess. Goodbye.
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#153I think she is lying. > Tursun said she was forcibly sterilized in 2019 through a surgical procedure, along with hundreds of other Uighur women. (2019) "Kalbinur Tursun, 36, entrusted five of her children to relatives when she left Xinjiang to give birth in Istanbul but has been unable to contact them for several years" - https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/28/world/asia/china-xinjiang... But happy for a logical explanat…
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
The labeling is not arbitrary but based in the UN definition: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: - Killing members of the group; - Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; ... -Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; ... https://…
All three definitely apply to Han Chinese: - The number of executions is treated as a state secret, but most likely a lot of people are killed every year, including for political "crimes". - Chinese prisons used to be labor camps by default and many continue to operate as such, including torture and rape by prison guards. - The one-child policy was all about preventing births and involved sterilizing more than half o…
The dilemma faced by China and the West, regarding their ways of life, is that they are operating on 2 systems that are different down to a very fundamental level.
In short, China and the West have different values.
The sad thing is that outside of China and the West, there are actually more people being entirely left out of the discussion. And neither have the universal systems and resources to bring these people out of their suffering.
Til this day, China's treatment on Uighurs are still highly secretive. That leads to the claim of internment of 1 million Uighurs become a superficial paly thing by both sides:
* China certainly are very content that no domestic instability because that 1 million figure is obviously not trustworthy to Chinese people. (Note that there is no way to verify the truth, as that's CCP's tactic all along; there is always the national security card prevent any forceful international investigation).
* The West are also very comfortable because they can outrageously condemn CCP for various political objectives. Do they really care about the 1 Million Uighurs? Obviously yes, but probably is behind a long list other concerns.
This dilemma (or pleasant situation if we think about it as a whole) is a reflection of the incompatibility of 2 systems. It is a clash of civilizations. And that clash is not movable by the seemingly good will of the people: if you ask the people in China and the West they would universally say that they like the people from the other side, and they just dont like their government. But they are merely unconscious of the fact that the clash is happening not because of the government, but really was by the people's will, through the thousands of channels of influences that the puny Human brain will never fully grasp.
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#155They're using "genocide" in the same sense of the word as people who allege "white genocide", i.e., to mean that policies are reducing fertility of a certain demographic. Specifically, they allege: > the use of arbitrary detention, political re-education, forced labour, torture and forced sterilization The traditional, dictionary definition of genocide is "the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a par…
No, they aren't. They are using genocide as a generally accepted legal term, and not a dictionary definition, or an interpretation of the root words that make up the word. Read the definition of genocide as it pertains to international law by reviewing the UN page on the topic[1]. There is a specific meaning, and it relates to the intention of destroying the Uigher people as a cultural identity through a campaign of…
Fair enough.
(It's too late to edit my comment, but I would strike out the disingenuous claim if I could.)
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#156I think she is lying. > Tursun said she was forcibly sterilized in 2019 through a surgical procedure, along with hundreds of other Uighur women. (2019) "Kalbinur Tursun, 36, entrusted five of her children to relatives when she left Xinjiang to give birth in Istanbul but has been unable to contact them for several years" - https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/28/world/asia/china-xinjiang... But happy for a logical explanat…
It's not clear to me from the quotes you provided why you think she's lying? She said she was sterilized in 2019 at the age of 36 after having given birth to five or more children. I don't see anything especially suspicious there.
Kalbinur Tursun might be a made up name being used for Uyghurs being interviewed. It's probably two people.
I see now the Chinese government have stated the original Kalbinur Tursun was a pseudonym - http://jeddah.china-consulate.org/eng/zt/xjfk/t1767403.htm
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
The party whip has that power; the threat is to lose access to committee appointments, cabinet positions, or to even be kicked from the party. Or simply to have the party not adequately fund your re-election campaign.
These things are retaliation. If your only option is to retaliate afterward, then by definition you're not able to force it.
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
All three definitely apply to Han Chinese: - The number of executions is treated as a state secret, but most likely a lot of people are killed every year, including for political "crimes". - Chinese prisons used to be labor camps by default and many continue to operate as such, including torture and rape by prison guards. - The one-child policy was all about preventing births and involved sterilizing more than half o…
The overlooking of certain behavior never was justification of the the same behavior on other occasions. The dilemma faced by China and the West, regarding their ways of life, is that they are operating on 2 systems that are different down to a very fundamental level. In short, China and the West have different values. The sad thing is that outside of China and the West, there are actually more people being entirely…
The idea that Chinese people and "Western" people are fundamentally different seems to deny the fact that humans as whole share common needs and common motivations. If China and the West have incompatible values, where does that leave other countries of the East? Does India count as the West? What about Japan or South Korea or Taiwan? What about countries in the Global South, are their values incompatible with both the West and China? Plenty of those countries have ratified ICCPR[2].
[0] http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-02/22/c_139758736.htm
[1] https://thediplomat.com/2021/02/can-china-change-the-definit...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Civi...
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
The overlooking of certain behavior never was justification of the the same behavior on other occasions. The dilemma faced by China and the West, regarding their ways of life, is that they are operating on 2 systems that are different down to a very fundamental level. In short, China and the West have different values. The sad thing is that outside of China and the West, there are actually more people being entirely…
I am not so convinced by this "clash of civilizations" or "different values" rhetoric. I know this is the standard party response to many foreign criticisms of Chinese politics, but to me it comes across as a bit like the Chinese version of American exceptionalism. The recent effort to push a Chinese view of human rights[0][1] into the UN, I find to be cynical and politically motivated. The idea that Chinese people a…
This is not true.
This was even rejected by Mr. Xi himself, quote [1]:
""" The world must "oppose politicization and stigmatization" over Covid-19, Xi said in the pre-recorded address, urging world leaders to embrace the "concept of a big family... and avoid falling into the trap of a clash of civilizations." """
One could interpret this as Xi actually agree with this view point, and simply try to avoid fall into the trap. Then we can reasonably conclude that Xi and CCP do not want to follow this line of thinking. Here I am assuming Xi is so powerful that he can largely shape CCP thought, which was widely agreed upon as a truthful statement.
> deny the fact that humans as whole share common needs and common motivations
This is quite a bland statement. And itself bears little factual support.
Political values, as we are here discussing, seldom agree. CCP in its face adopts socialism and intends to move towards communism. That's 180 degree opposite of US domestic political theoretic.
The so-called common value is quickly turning into a lie when it goes beyond typical bodily needs. Even that is a problem, like many Western media would state Chinese need to consume less pork, because of the climate change concerns. Since when the West believe one should be subject to the whole's needs?
[1] https://news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/09/23/20/xi-defends-chinas...
Re: Canada's parliament votes to label China's persecution of Uighurs as genocide
#160I am not sure what term is apporopiate for the horrific treatment, but I found the Economist's point quite valid. > By the common understanding of the word, it is not. Just as “homicide” means killing a person and “suicide” means killing yourself, “genocide” means killing a people. China’s persecution of the Uyghurs is horrific: it has locked up perhaps 1m of them in prison camps, which it naturally mislabels “vocati…
It's the same reason why Pompeo pressed for genocide on his way out, despite his own state department finding there's insufficient evidence for such determination, compared to more appropriate "crimes against humanity" or "cultural genocide". Bluntly because the latter two have no formal conventions, i.e. there is no obligation to punish. The semantic game is significant and self-serving. If punishment for "crimes against humanity" were ever formalized, it would open up US actions to similar scrutiny (i.e. war crimes). Similarly for Canada, labelling XJ "cultural genocide" and setting norms to punish it would open Canada to punishment. Hence elaborate propaganda, exaggerated word games and non-binding resolutions. To be clear, XJ is absolutely "cultural genocide" / "crimes against humanity" - but it's not genocide. If the US state department, under lying Pompeo can't comfortably rationalize the determination, it's because the accusation is flawed. Rather these efforts are specifically designed to target only Chinese human rights violations while insulate against western ones.
A serious campaign actually sympathetic to human rights will attempt to prosecute XJ as "crimes against humanity", for which there is a feasible avenue for prosecution, and start a formalize process for punishing this and future events. But Canada doesn't want to do that, because they will suffer from the fallout. The US doesn't want to do that... because lol, the Hague Invasion Act exists specifically so US can get away with "crimes against humanity". Realistically no country wants to go down that route, not just because no hands are clean, but because no one wants to be punished the next time their hands get dirty. Finally, there's no compelling reason to insist on "genocide" label outside of domestic politics, which will never stick internationally, least of all because China still has plurality international support, from Islamic nations no less, for XJ being a counter insurgency response. TL;DR: it's theatre.