After following Peter Schiff for over a decade, and him being thoroughly wrong about inflation after 2008, I can't help but think "this time is different". Before 2020 all money printing went to banks, which increased the wealth of the 1% and increased asset prices, but it didn't create inflation. But now, we have actual helicopter money. And this time I believe Peter when he says, once you start with stimulus cheque…
If I gift money to an extremely over leveraged banks to save them and, with puckered sphincters (they just saw the abyss), they hold onto it then we won’t “see inflation”. It’s there, but it’s latent inflation.
If I demolish wages by exporting jobs overseas, that will have a deflationary effect to counter the effect of inflation.
If I replace cocoa butter with food wax, I hide inflation.
If I don’t include price of housing in the CPI [1], I manipulate inflation.
Schiff’s theory is sound. But, like the GME debacle proved, it’s like shoring a doomed company. Can you stay solvent long enough to prove your point?
[1] I know and understand the argument why houses it arent included. I just reject the argument completely as flawed.