131–140 of 218 posts
As far as I can tell, serious conservatives haven't been touched.
Watch as Trump supporters use every logical fallacy in the book to avoid this fact.
Number one with 27 points in 20 minutes for yet another chan board (named...pepe ) with a risible rationale? News for hackers, indeed.
I didn’t know what R5N was until I read this. Ignoring technology because you don’t like the context seems short sighted.
If that seems fine to you (speaking royally here), you're in the right place.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meh, at least it goes into some technical details. More than I can say for some of the crap that reaches the front page.
I was out, when it didn't use Blockchain
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You sir, are not familiar with the old testament.
I... am? This is actually my entire point. It's a principle broken on many occasions, but nobody walks around saying "Oh, we shouldn't even TALK about not killing — that's IGNORANT — because there are so many exceptions where it's okay to kill people." You can still guide around important principles, even if reality imposes exceptions!
Parler is a shit hole, and at this point I’m not sure we need another social network anything. The major ones do a lousy job of policing fake news and misinformation, and from your tone it sounds like you support that garbage. I’m pretty sure giving every moron on earth a globally-accessible soapbox is about the stupidest idea humankind has ever had.
I'm not sure how anyone holds this opinion. Do you really believe that this will result in fair, unbiased reporting? Who is the long-term great arbiter not only of the news but removal of non-news? I'm also not sure why your worldview seems to be that given access to all opinions, the stupidest ones too, people will not and cannot learn to make informed judgements for themselves. You will see some stupidity but it's…
One could make the argument that the eras in which only those who had money or political power had a real voice resulted in a more stable society. Allow everyone to have a voice (full freedom of speech) but outlaw platforms that truly try to give a voice to everyone. If someone really wants to put out a message they can go to the street corner and shout whatever they like, no matter how bad it is, unrestricted.
Parler is a shit hole, and at this point I’m not sure we need another social network anything. The major ones do a lousy job of policing fake news and misinformation, and from your tone it sounds like you support that garbage. I’m pretty sure giving every moron on earth a globally-accessible soapbox is about the stupidest idea humankind has ever had.
These exact same things were said about the printing-press when it was the epitome of new, high-technology.
Parler is a shit hole, and at this point I’m not sure we need another social network anything. The major ones do a lousy job of policing fake news and misinformation, and from your tone it sounds like you support that garbage. I’m pretty sure giving every moron on earth a globally-accessible soapbox is about the stupidest idea humankind has ever had.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not secure enough? People operating the servers see everything you are doing, this is no-no for whistleblowers.
You operate your own servers You use your own encryption