Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a lot, it's 0.9 $/kwh, which depending on where you live is about 10-30x the retail price of electricity under normal circumstances. If it's only for a few days/weeks, it's not going to matter a lot (financially) to most. Of course there are a few people who are going to get squeezed hard by this and I imagine some businesses are also going to have some hefty bills. It's tempting to single out technologies or pa…
Do normal households and small businesses keep track of prices ? Are they able to cap their bills in any way ? In my country, where I live, the per unit prices are fixed and any increases are announced. I doubt whether people anywhere could keep up with 10-30x changes in prices.
Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
261–270 of 347 posts
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#262Is it possible for Western Canada to contribute into the US grid?
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#263I track my electricity in Chicago pretty regularly and we’ve been seeing between 5x and 100x ‘normal’ pricing all week. For scale, at this time of night I’d expect my power to be priced at ~ 0.8 c/Kwh. Right now we are sitting at 15 c/Kwh.
Here in CA we pay 24c / Kwh on a regular basis. Why is it your power can be 0.8c/Kwh?, that seems really really low.
tiers are .24/.31/.39 per kwh
https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_SCHED...
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chernobyl may have less deaths, but it affected the health of hundreds of thousands. If you think about the danger of renewable sources of energy, know that there is not alternative because we have no alternative planet. Betwwwn 250,000 accidental deaths and billions of suffering people, I choose the former.
But where are the billions suffering from nuclear power? As you point out, even with a generous accounting, Chernobyl was orders of magnitude less than that.
1. Chernobyl was an old, unsafe design, and the disaster was human error. There are better safer designs.
2. The true toll of Chernobyl is the hundreds of thousands of people killed due to pollution from coal plants (52000 per year in US alone). Lives that could be saved if countries had shifted to Nuclear more aggressively.
I don't know why you think billions are suffering from Nuclear plants. About 20% of total power generation in US is from Nuclear. Can you tell me how many millions are suffering from it?
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great! Now go tear down the entire housing stock so we can rebuild it better. Unfortunately, as a society we're already under-building, so we can't really afford to tear down what we've already got. In some places (like here in the Bay Area) it's ridiculously difficult and expensive to build anything, so much of the building stock is untouched since the 1950s and simply rots in place. We'd do well to be as good at ho…
> Great! Now go tear down the entire housing stock so we can rebuild it better. Unfortunately, as a society we're already under-building, so we can't really afford to tear down what we've already got. Well, why not? Japan effectively rebuilt its entire housing stock few times over since WW2, and so did Britain, Germany, and ex-Union countries. I believe USA has more money than the broke USSR did 20 year timelines is…
Note that this doesn't really matter. It especially didn't matter back then in a less globalized economy. The USSR being poor doesn't change anything about their domestic labor pool, which is what is relevant for construction work. The laborers simply charge less.
This is same fallacy that leads people to believe we'd magically have more of everything if money hoarded by rich people was distributed across the populace. At best stuff will be distributed better. But bakers won't start baking more bread, nor will car manufacturers be able to start making more cars. Assuming unemployment stays the same, the economic output of goods won't change.
Money doesn't produce anything, people do. Money is a tool to guide labor in the right direction and distribute goods.
Which means that in order to build more, the USA would either need more construction workers or become more efficient at constructing stuff. The first can be achieved by diverting money and making the job more attractive, the second by creating a competitive environment.
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Great! Now go tear down the entire housing stock so we can rebuild it better. Unfortunately, as a society we're already under-building, so we can't really afford to tear down what we've already got. Well, why not? Japan effectively rebuilt its entire housing stock few times over since WW2, and so did Britain, Germany, and ex-Union countries. I believe USA has more money than the broke USSR did 20 year timelines is…
>I believe USA has more money than the broke USSR did Note that this doesn't really matter. It especially didn't matter back then in a less globalized economy. The USSR being poor doesn't change anything about their domestic labor pool, which is what is relevant for construction work. The laborers simply charge less. This is same fallacy that leads people to believe we'd magically have more of everything if money hoa…
I simply don't see anything much profitable left for USA to produce. No more expensive stuff left to make.
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#267I need more context. Is that a lot? Is that low? Is it a big change from before? In what direction?
900/Mwh is 90c per kwh. Normal wholesale is about 5-7c. Retail national average is about 14. Higher cost states are around 20c with Hawaii near 30c.
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I believe USA has more money than the broke USSR did Note that this doesn't really matter. It especially didn't matter back then in a less globalized economy. The USSR being poor doesn't change anything about their domestic labor pool, which is what is relevant for construction work. The laborers simply charge less. This is same fallacy that leads people to believe we'd magically have more of everything if money hoa…
What else do you propose American workers to produce? More cat video websites? I simply don't see anything much profitable left for USA to produce. No more expensive stuff left to make.
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#269Note there are three tabs in this graphic: Day-ahead, 15 minute, and real-time. Day-ahead contracts are high because uncertainty is also high. 15 minute and real-time prices are an order of magnitude lower, despite the sun being down and electric heaters presumably consuming a lot of electricity. Energy companies need to decide how much of their capacity they want to lock in at the high $900 rate for tomorrow, and ho…
Yes, daily averages vary wildly in industrialised countries with real time electricity pricing. In much of Europe, residential, and office will pay $0.3-0.5 during normal use in winter, but dramatically less in off-peak hour in countries with "smart meters." This way you get seemingly sensible $0.1-$0.2 per kWh averages , but drop your jaw when you see your electricity bill.
Re: Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised by this. I would have guessed lots of solar there and potentially wind.
Lots of answers about various renewables, no one addressing why diesel, so let me throw that in: Everything comes to Hawaii by boat or plane, and boats run on diesel. So our power plants burn diesel, instead of coal, because coal, while cheaper per unit energy, would be a whole additional supply chain just for power plants. And yeah, there's more solar and wind every year, but not nearly enough to provide the overpro…
The other islands burn diesel, from the refinery on Oahu.
The ships also burned heavy fuel oil until this year.