Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why it will always be worth paying inflated salaries for FAANG companies. Taking all the top talent is a moat.
I don't think any company can afford to employ a significant percentage of the world's tech workers. Google has 150,000 staff, and even if half of them are developers that's only about 0.25% of the number of developers globally. Employing people as a moat only works within a large city (or a few dozen large cities). It can't be done if people can work from anywhere.
Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
281–290 of 414 posts
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my opinion the artificial bubble is more the SV-type salaries. Compare developers salaries with similarly educated/skilled engineers in other disciplines (mechanical, electrical, aerospace, civil…), you'll see that SV developers are the outlier. The reality is that on the global market you can get a good mid-level dev from a first-world country for half that price. And it's not artificial, it's just the market at…
You are wrong. The revenue impact of more manufacturing heavy and device heavy industries is lower for those engineers - that’s just how the overhead of other engineering and biotech companies work. Software is fundamentally different and the revenue impact can be multiples or even orders of magnitude higher, in really any industry or company type. Software engineers, even in Silicon valley, are underpaid relative to…
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's not that complicated. On paper.
It really isn't all that complicated though, and just takes money to fix the urban planning mistakes that have been made in many metropolitan cities. Montreal is probably the most livable "big" city in North America, and it's mostly because of three things: 1. Excellent transportation. The metro is for the most part consistent, extremely affordable (it's ~$85/month, and about half that for students and youth), safe,…
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's only 2/3 top universities (if you are being generous, 1 if honest) that are match worldwide here (have people doing substantial research, funding valuable companies or just working in FANGs) producing around 100 graduates per year (combined). This gives me some ballpark estimate.
I myself have a CS degree from a Polish university that's regularly in top1-top3 of the rankings. I don't think it means that much. We've had a fair share of people who didn't enjoy the work that much and did bare minimum. On the other hand, I've worked with plenty of people from lower ranked universities who didn't graduate in CS (but, for example in Maths or Physics) who are very strong contributors. The truth is t…
> Anyone who expected hands-on grappling with hard CS problems will be disappointed.
Those people are above my lvl and I estimate them to be max 30 per year.
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#285Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having worked in many EU countries, I've never once had salary quoted or discussed after tax.
“After tax” in the US means after the employee pays their own share of various income taxes. The portion of those taxes paid by the employer are not discussed (in salary discussions). Either way, the point stands - for cross-border salary discussions, you need to consider the “fully loaded” cost of an employee, not just net salary. You also have to consider non-cash benefits and costs (high US salaries offset by high…
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure sure about that. The 6x places can pay that because of high revenue per employee. It's not like the 1x places will suddenly see a higher revenue per employee to pay higher compensation.
There's people scattered all over the country making 2x-3x rates that could have been earning 6x, but moving to San Fran or NYC was never a feasible option. The 6x companies will offer them 4x, settle on 4.5x, and both parties are happy. It will inevitably drive down the 6x pay, but drive up the 1x-3x pay. However, the companies will be the real winners though unless there's some type of coordination between all empl…
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure sure about that. The 6x places can pay that because of high revenue per employee. It's not like the 1x places will suddenly see a higher revenue per employee to pay higher compensation.
There's people scattered all over the country making 2x-3x rates that could have been earning 6x, but moving to San Fran or NYC was never a feasible option. The 6x companies will offer them 4x, settle on 4.5x, and both parties are happy. It will inevitably drive down the 6x pay, but drive up the 1x-3x pay. However, the companies will be the real winners though unless there's some type of coordination between all empl…
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#288Make hay while the sun shines. A true shift to remote work, should it happen, spells the eventual end of insanely high SF FANMAG salaries. Market forces will soon close these opportunities. My limited experience tells me people aren't prepared for homogenization of salaries across geographies: South East England, outside London: 1x London: 2x New York: 3x San Francisco: 6x On making hay: A friend of mine is currently…
ok, I think we can all agree not to add any more letters to that acronym at this point and just call it big tech. Although I really would like to get a job at GAFNDMRASDGAMGICZ soon.
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assuming your number of 1 cent/stream, and considering that 7$ out of the 10$ subscription pays for the music, that gives an average of 23 streams/day for a subscriber. That's about 80 minutes of music per day, down to 50 minutes or less if you're sharing the subscription.
And somehow terrestrial radio stations, which have no subscription base manage to make it work. As I said in the comment above, artists are free to NOT put their music on Spotify if they don't think it's a good deal, but regardless streaming services are only commercials for artists. Spotify is far from the worst offender. :-)
Re: Spotify is letting employees work from anywhere while paying SF and NY salaries
#290Make hay while the sun shines. A true shift to remote work, should it happen, spells the eventual end of insanely high SF FANMAG salaries. Market forces will soon close these opportunities. My limited experience tells me people aren't prepared for homogenization of salaries across geographies: South East England, outside London: 1x London: 2x New York: 3x San Francisco: 6x On making hay: A friend of mine is currently…
Why not double down and get two “full time” jobs. I’ve heard from my friend in BoA that he works less than 1 hour per day.
TC: 800k