Welcome to the club(house)
11–15 of 15 posts
Re: Welcome to the club(house)
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s in the article
Do you know it's against the site guidelines here to just accuse people of not reading the article rather than actually presenting an argument? It doesn't matter how attractive a platform is if you simply aren't going to get onto it. Clubhouse can make me interested, but can't actually get me onboarded.
I can imagine a scenario though, were they gradually increase the number of invites they give out. I think the idea is that the perception of scarcity will persist, even when invites aren't really scarce.
Re: Welcome to the club(house)
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you know it's against the site guidelines here to just accuse people of not reading the article rather than actually presenting an argument? It doesn't matter how attractive a platform is if you simply aren't going to get onto it. Clubhouse can make me interested, but can't actually get me onboarded.
Yeah, it's not in the article. I can imagine a scenario though, were they gradually increase the number of invites they give out. I think the idea is that the perception of scarcity will persist, even when invites aren't really scarce.
Re: Welcome to the club(house)
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it's not in the article. I can imagine a scenario though, were they gradually increase the number of invites they give out. I think the idea is that the perception of scarcity will persist, even when invites aren't really scarce.
Right - the bulk of the article is about how the “cool factor” of scarcity and variable rewards induce a demand greater than what might be there if they were simply wide open.
Re: Welcome to the club(house)
#15Want to know how Clubhouse uses product psychology to draw in users and generate hype? Check out this post.