Live data from Hacker News

Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

theverge.com

711–720 of 1001 posts

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#711

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Discord isn't on your side. They're an unprofitable (so far) VC-backed company whose only customer-facing product is a well-designed chat client. They're clearly trying to build a platform for PR- and ad-friendly discourse. Nobody should be surprised when weirdos get the ban.

> ad-friendly discourse Discord has zero ads, FYI.

They show (or showed) continuous ads for Krisp.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#712

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Discord isn't on your side. They're an unprofitable (so far) VC-backed company whose only customer-facing product is a well-designed chat client. They're clearly trying to build a platform for PR- and ad-friendly discourse. Nobody should be surprised when weirdos get the ban.

They made $120 million in revenue last year from selling Nitro custom user ids, emoji packs, etc.

Revenue != profits

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#713

Discord would claim its “hateful and discriminatory content” for anything in the fucked up reality we are currently living in. For instance, if you call someone retarded and a mod doesn't step in, that is considered hateful. Even though retard is in the dictionary and a widely accepted term by many people. Then saying that only retards buy the shit hedgefunds are peddling would also be considered discriminatory. I'm…

I wholeheartedly agree with you, and I hope this means people go back to IRC instead of using centralised services run by retards.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#714

This is really exciting, feels like open standards, independent internet is going to continue getting extreme motivation to expand and establish, with private "freedom of speech" censorship by for-profit platforms. We're going to see more fragmentation, and growth of closed platforms perceived by users as "slightly less evil" such as telegram vs watsapp. This may also motivate the return to truly open internet ideals…

People need to stop being so lazy and throwing around the word censorship. If a bunch or teenagers come into my coffee shop and start loudly calling each autists and retards I'm going to kick them out. I'm not censoring them by kicking them out.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#715
post #582

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. Small nitpick: retard in WSB context is not entirely an insult. You can swap letters and come up with trader. It’s WSBs special way of saying you belong to it’s retail trader group that does stupid bets.

This is really important context. WSB traders use words that some would consider offensive in an affectionate way. “Degenerate gambling addict” sounds terrible but it’s a compliment there. Criticising people’s language without their context reminds me of Americans getting upset when they hear Spanish speakers say the word “black”.

WSB users are so into the argument about context that they forgot that when borrowing from another language, that language's context doesn't just vanish.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#716

This is really exciting, feels like open standards, independent internet is going to continue getting extreme motivation to expand and establish, with private "freedom of speech" censorship by for-profit platforms. We're going to see more fragmentation, and growth of closed platforms perceived by users as "slightly less evil" such as telegram vs watsapp. This may also motivate the return to truly open internet ideals…

People need to stop being so lazy and throwing around the word censorship. If a bunch or teenagers come into my coffee shop and start loudly calling each autists and retards I'm going to kick them out. I'm not censoring them by kicking them out.

And you need to review the code of conduct for this platform, as you are in violation and, according to your own logic, should be kicked. (Which I oppose)

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#717

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They made $120 million in revenue last year from selling Nitro custom user ids, emoji packs, etc.

100 million MAUs can't be cheap to maintain. You're probably getting downvoted because revenue != profit.

They have expenses, but they also have a rapidly growing (YoY) revenue source. I didn't think I'd need to point out all the pieces of the puzzle.

I'm tired of getting downvoted with every post I make. I can understand when I defend freedom of speech or attack Apple or Google or China that I offend people, but it's happening all the time on totally benign posts.

It's making me cynical about the community. HN is great for information discovery and diversity of experience, but it feels like people are becoming increasingly vicious.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#718
post #571

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> immature Get your point across without stomping a category of person.

I'm curious, do people who get upset at this word never learn classical piano? Because, well, you're going to encounter that word quite frequently if you do.

It’s also the common way to refer to viola players in the violin community

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#719

This is really exciting, feels like open standards, independent internet is going to continue getting extreme motivation to expand and establish, with private "freedom of speech" censorship by for-profit platforms. We're going to see more fragmentation, and growth of closed platforms perceived by users as "slightly less evil" such as telegram vs watsapp. This may also motivate the return to truly open internet ideals…

People need to stop being so lazy and throwing around the word censorship. If a bunch or teenagers come into my coffee shop and start loudly calling each autists and retards I'm going to kick them out. I'm not censoring them by kicking them out.

It would only be a fair parable if your coffee shop was the only coffeshop in the entire city or that it exists like 1-3 others but you all talk with eachother on the phone and collectively agree to deny those people service.

Re: Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went private for a while

#720
post #711

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ad-friendly discourse Discord has zero ads, FYI.

They show (or showed) continuous ads for Krisp.

Showing the trademark of a technology they are using in the product, for the purposes of identification of said technology does not count as advertising. According to your reasoning, they would have to say "we use some other company's noise reduction". And no, the chat view (or the voice chat view) does not show the Krisp logo continuously.
Post reply on HN