Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
41–50 of 114 posts
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#42At least Cuil has some respect for privacy: "We do not keep logs of our users’ search activity." "We analyze the Web, not our users. Read our Privacy Policy for details. It’s short." http://www.cuil.com/info/privacy/
But Jo(e) User doesn't really care about that, he or she cares about search results. If (and admittedly this is unproven) Google can deliver better search results by logging and analyzing search activity to personalize results, then Cuil is already at a disadvantage.
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's very worrying. Adverts people might be interested in shown to them? Cause for concern...
You're probably intentionally missing the point -- but what I was referring to is the fact that they are quite unashamed about retaining data about me.
I don't think this is worrying. If they start using personal data they hold, sure, but this is just creating a personalized experience. Lots of sites do it. If you don't like them doing it, disable cookies for them...
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#44I found the result page lot different compared to google UI. Its paradigm shift and difficult to comprehend. Our brain and eyes are used to google search result look and feel.
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#45Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#46So far they're vague on this. Ironically Cuil was useless, http://www.cuil.com/search?q=cuil%20money&sl=long http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cuil+money&btnG...
but with google I found this:
"Eventually, Cuil plans to make money by running ads alongside search results, she said, but provided no further details."
The design is nice and the layout/features seem promising, though. Pleasant to use when it works.
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#471.) Quality of Search-- In order to be successful, the quality of their search must be at least as good as Google (obviously it much more helpful if it's better). As many have noted, this clearly is not the case right now, and slightly complex queries such as "Linux search and remove multiple files" return zero results.
2.) Revenue Stream-- As noted above, it is going to be difficult for Cuil to break into the search market because they have to achieve such a high quality of search. But even if they are successful breaking into the market, how are they going to generate revenue? An Adsense like program? That's just another thing that they would have to do better then Google, and I just don't see both things happening.
3.) Overcoming Inertia-- Even if Cuil addresses 1 and 2, the moment of inertia of an average Google user is very high. Google has the best web mail available on the market, and along with all the other services Google provides, people will be reluctant to switch their searching to Cuil because everything else that they do will still be through Google.
I don't mean to be negative, and more power to these guys for taking on an area of the web that most people are afraid to even look at. But I guess I would say that if I were to plan a startup, I would probably pick a more advantageous slice of the market (probably one that doesn't exist at the time of planning). At the same time, you have to play your strengths as a programmer, and it seems like thats what the Cuil team is doing.
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think google is more 'spellable' than cuil... or is it ciul or coul or ceul. Hell, the title for the post spells it with 2 'l's
That is pretty ironic considering that google is actually a misspelling -- the correct spelling is "googol".
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#49Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity.
Thanks for your patience."
Re: Ex-Google engineers debut 'Cuil' way to search
#50with http://www.cuil.com/search?q=hacker+news we get an url to this site, good.
with http://www.cuil.com/search?q=hackernews we get a link to pretty what I've put up: eg: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bootload/2710119622/
with http://www.cuil.com/search?q=cuil you get no mention of the site itself.
with http://www.cuil.com/search?q=spock you get a peek of how they cuil are structuring more complex searches using drop down menus - bad because it's slower to read & requires a conscious effort to do so.