Live data from Hacker News

Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

pidgin.im

141–150 of 461 posts

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#141
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mate, the general population increasingly don’t even use desktops or laptops for personal usage anymore let alone a desktop OS specific IM client from the early 2000s.

My daughter (who teaches math at HS) asked me to create educational videos for her kids who don't know how to work a computer. They only know phones.

Kids can't use computers.

http://www.coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-co...

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does not everyone still use it? I and most of my friends do. They are also responsible for my favorite bug report ever: https://bugs.gentoo.org/35890

What chat protocol do you use it with?

XMPP, Discord, Skype, and Matrix.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#143
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I finally stopped using it when Google Chat[0] went away. [0] Not that Google Chat, the other one.

The good old time, when Google used XMPP..

Does it not still do so?

I'm fairly certain that I'm using Pidgin's XMPP functionality to communicate with others that are receiving their end in Google Hangouts.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#144
post #92

Considering this is open source (which I'm assuming includes the plugins), wouldn't this be a much better alternative to the native apps on mobile? Curious as to why this hasn't been ported to Android/iOS. I'd much prefer this over apps that need permission to my blood type to function. Pidgin was great back in the day for convenience, but there is a legitimate argument to be made for privacy here too. EDIT: It just…

Background execution restrictions mean you would not be able to be online except when the app was in the foreground for the most part on iOS; on Android, you have inconsistent access to cpu and network in the background. You really need push notifications, but AFAIK, push tokens are tied to the app developer; you can't give an random server a token from your app, because they won't be able to push to you.

Yeah that would be expensive for the pidgin maintainers, if the other message services had a way to do that via oauth or some such that would be different but entirely not in their interests.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#145
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

yep. I used it when I had to talk to all my friends on msn messanger etc.. one app to talk to everyone no matter what they where using. Now I have to have 10 different apps to talk to just 10 friends.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#146
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had a real Obi Wan Kenobi moment when I saw this at the top of hackernews.

I wonder if he means old Ben Kenobi

These are not the IM protocols you seek.

On-topic, Pidgin remains great, I still install it on every new desktop, but I haven't fired it up in years. I suppose it's been displaced by Slack, more's the pity.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#147
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

Oh yes. Good times. That's when I still occasionally used AIM.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#148
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

Yes, unless you used KDE, in which case you installed Kopete.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#149
post #117
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

And GAIM was based on Gamera, the official AOL Linux client.

I don't think so - I believe the original GAIM client used the open TOC protocol, e.g. from TiK which was the official Tk-based AIM client, some years before Gamera.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#150
post #134
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This argument has been argued over and over. Either the passwords are stored in some form of symmetric encryption to which the secret is not required to be entered by the user on startup, in which case it's just security theater as malware/nosy fellow users can just grab the key too, or they make you enter a master key on startup, which most users will not enable The same is ultimately true for browser password manag…

Windows and Mac have had solutions to this for years. You can encrypt user files using their OS login, so they don't have to decrypt every time they start the app.

What does this gain over just encrypting the drive/backups? Anything running on the system has the same access.

If the drive is not encrypted, surely for Windows at least it's possible to reverse engineer the encryption secret. Maybe on Mac you could do something with T2, but now your config is not portable, and still doesn't solve the malware on the system case or the "your sibling/visitor/housemate whoever has physical access".

Post reply on HN