Live data from Hacker News

DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

krebsonsecurity.com

31–40 of 327 posts

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#31
post #2

Not all heroes wear capes. They just make phone calls.

Why are you praising someone with too much time on their hands attempting to limit freedom of speech? Really sad and pathetic.

Deplatforming is a freedom of association issue.

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#32

Imagine making it your life's goal to destroy other people's legal product because you don't like how a small group of others are using it. The technologists of our society have so much potential to work on important tasks for humanity that far outweigh one person trying to make his own social media site.

[deleted]

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#33
post #7

Scotland should kick them out as well. Also I find it kind of hilarious how many people who hate Brian Krebs go out of their way to comment on his website. “Free speech” warriors don’t seem to understand freedom to associate or free markets. De-platforming violent extremists works. We should keep doing it. And shame any company willing to work with violent extremists.

Yea anyone we label violent extremists should be completely and utterly deplatformed. Also reported to their employer so they cannot earn money that enables them to commit more violence.

> anyone we label violent extremists should be completely and utterly deplatformed

They've labeled themselves, though, by espousing violent extremist views.

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you praising someone with too much time on their hands attempting to limit freedom of speech? Really sad and pathetic.

Ah yes, freedom[0] of speech[1]. 0: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200630/23525844821/parle... 1: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200627/23551144803/as-pr...

What's your point?

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#36
post #16

These goings-on make me very aware of the fact that I'm still not settled on the matter of free speech. I used to be very pro-free-speech, but on the other hand, I'm anti-fascism, and I don't know what's worse: Giving fascists a platform to spew hate, or set a precedent for potentially limiting my own speech down the line? It's nowhere near clear-cut, and I'd like to hear some opinions on this.

If fascism is defined as the merger of corporation and state, does a dominant political party allying with major corporations to suppress a political opponent not ring alarm bells for fascism?

[deleted]

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#37

These goings-on make me very aware of the fact that I'm still not settled on the matter of free speech. I used to be very pro-free-speech, but on the other hand, I'm anti-fascism, and I don't know what's worse: Giving fascists a platform to spew hate, or set a precedent for potentially limiting my own speech down the line? It's nowhere near clear-cut, and I'd like to hear some opinions on this.

My opinion is that you just described Twitter way more than you described Parler, but the narrative is dead set on convincing you otherwise.

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems pretty cut and dry; DDoS-Guard would need a physical presence there to operate, they didn't, so the IPs were revoked. The phone call was simply a tip to investigate.

Not quite. > DDoS-Guard CEO Evgeniy Marchenko maintains the company has done nothing wrong, and that DDoS-Guard does indeed have a presence in Belize. So they acted without any investigation because "uh oh, here comes the mob".

Where's that quote from? The article points out they make no mention of any Belize presence, and LACNIC spent several months investigating the tip, which happened in November. That hardly seems reactionary.

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you praising someone with too much time on their hands attempting to limit freedom of speech? Really sad and pathetic.

Deplatforming is a freedom of association issue.

Or fear of the mob. We will be using DDoS-Guard going forward to show support for those with a spine.

Re: DDoS-Guard to forfeit internet space occupied by Parler

#40

These goings-on make me very aware of the fact that I'm still not settled on the matter of free speech. I used to be very pro-free-speech, but on the other hand, I'm anti-fascism, and I don't know what's worse: Giving fascists a platform to spew hate, or set a precedent for potentially limiting my own speech down the line? It's nowhere near clear-cut, and I'd like to hear some opinions on this.

Not letting others speak IS fascism.
Post reply on HN