Live data from Hacker News

Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

arrl.org

151–160 of 312 posts

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It'll be interesting to see if the CBP finally flexes its muscle and seizes them.

Why would the CBP seize radios that are perfectly legal to sell? That wouldn't be "flexing", that would be "over-reach".

They're not legal in the US, in the way they're sold usually, they claim to be Part 90, and they're not

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#152
post #107

Baofeng's, Baofengs everywhere. Of all the images I have seen of the attempted coup, I have only seen baofeng radios. These are very cheap ($20'ish) radios that work very poorly (they splatter all over the bands) even when equipped with decent antennas. They barely work when equipped with the stock rubber-duck antennas. It's easy to be a snob about the type of radios that they are using, but that's not even the point…

The reason there's no requirement to identify yourself is that this stuff isn't hard to make and the FCC already employs professionals for tracking (this is a common sport) and arresting people who abuse the radios.

not sure what you're referring to, amateur operators have to identify themselves

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's interesting to note is that the Arab Spring was largely organized on social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. US media outlets were thrilled about this, and wrote article after article talking about how these platforms gave the common man the opportunity to vent about police brutality, corruption, election fraud, and unemployment in a way that simply wasn't possible previously. The general attitude at…

A "riot" to eject a dictator vs a "riot" to stop Congress from certifying the winner of the election/install Trump as dictator are - to my eyes - entirely different in character. People do what it takes to survive. Trump usurping power and ending 230 years of US democracy represents an existential threat. Don't be shocked that a lot of people and companies are not on-board with that idea and are willing to take extre…

When the dictator operates a secular government and the alternative is an ochlocratic theocracy, I don't think the morality of the situation is so clear cut.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where freedom of speech falls in the hierarchy of rights is not my concern. What is my concern, is who gets to choose what that hierarchy is and where freedom of speech exists on it. I'm arguing that the government is not who gets to determine what that hierarchy is, and thereby determine what gets to superceed freedom of speech.

very well, who gets to determine that hierarchy and how will they enforce their determinations?

Not the government. And why should anyone inflict their view of morality on anyone else?

I really don't want anyone - liberal, conservative, Christian or radical Islam - enforcing their determiniation of moral hierarchy on me. Do you?

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#155
post #138
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> These people are idiots. It makes me uneasy to see how much commentary on recent events seems to focus on insulting these people instead of hearing how society has failed them and why they're upset even if we tend to disagree with their suggested fixes. I think their presence in DC and that "colorful" person they elected are all symptoms of this behavior.

No amount of "economic anxiety" justifies an explicitly undemocratic coup attempt where people were running around looking to scalp democratically elected leaders. There are real ills in society, but - ignoring that republican voters are significantly uninformed about things like the party's support for healthcare, e.g. Efforts to scrap Obamacare largely hurt poor Trump voters - that doesn't excuse them from the fact…

Why are you and another reply quoting "economic anxiety" when that was never a claim I made? I'm talking about the total contempt you and others seem to have when talking about these people. If you think they are misinformed and have been misled, cool, let's reach out and try to help get them back on the golden path, but all I see is insult-slinging and you're still doing it.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

perfectly fine shitty radio Hah! What a great bit of word-smithing there. I love it. Yes, that's a good description of the Baofeng radios. They're crap, but they're fine crap. Cheap, but workable as a beginner radio. I bought mine right when I got my Technician license, and it's served well for dipping my toes in the water a little. But I'll be buying a higher quality radio soon, if all goes according to plan.

If you were to recommend a beginner radio, is a Baofeng what you'd recommend?

It depends on how much money you have, and how interested in VHF/UHF you are. If you're very interested in VHF/UHF (repeaters, simplex with your neighbors) and you only have $20, then it's the perfect radio for you.

If you have $10,000 and want to chat with people around the world, then you'll want something else. People hear "ham radio" and think "chatting with people all around the world", but that is not what Baofeng radios do :)

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#157
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Rebellion is bad, but maitaining some remote possibility is good. There is that little affair from 1765 to 1783 that gets generally good press, though. "Context is for kings" is tinged with irony on that one. > This case isn't really so bad because there's no prior restraint, no tools being taken away, or new tools for the government. Jokes aside, any sentence which contains "no tools being taken away" around messa…

>There is that little affair from 1765 to 1783 that gets generally good press, though Gets good press, but, compared to the Commonwealth countries, it's not clear it was really necessary or beneficial.

Are you talking about a territory like Bermuda, or the independent Commonwealth countries that were inspired by the Revolutionary War?

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#158
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your post reeks of elitism, which is very common in the radio community. Saying baofeng radios “barely work” when you use them with the antennas they come with is a blatant lie. I’m sorry that there’s some sort of “eternal September” in the radio community because of baofeng users, but lying won’t bring back the days when only people who could afford very expensive equipment could enjoy radios.

>Saying baofeng radios “barely work” when you use them with the antennas they come with is a blatant lie. Not a lie. Personal observation. When I first got the radio I tested it at our groups ham shack. I was 150' away from our repeater (open field, no obstructions) and could not get the repeater to acknowledge my signal. I could hear everybody fine, but could not TX. One of my buddies handed me a spare antenna, and…

I have worked a satellite with a Baofeng (and Yagi antenna), so at least one works.

I stopped using mine because I don't have a spectrum analyzer and was told by Reddit that they send a lot of power out of band, which isn't something I care to do.

(I have a VHF module in my KX3 that meets my VHF needs. Mostly. Would like even better frequency stability for meteor scatter, WSPR, etc.)

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#160
post #49

Baofeng's, Baofengs everywhere. Of all the images I have seen of the attempted coup, I have only seen baofeng radios. These are very cheap ($20'ish) radios that work very poorly (they splatter all over the bands) even when equipped with decent antennas. They barely work when equipped with the stock rubber-duck antennas. It's easy to be a snob about the type of radios that they are using, but that's not even the point…

As a pinch of salt... If you can get a baofeng to last out of the box longer than a week, and manage to DX a handheld or a repeater further than a parking space away, you should at least win a QRP award and a discount on your technicians test before you get sent to the klink.

I've had a UV-5R for four years. Receives fine. The handful of times I've used it to transmit on a local net nobody mentioned vomiting in disgust at its poor transmission characteristics. The original battery even still holds a charge, which I really didn't expect, since it's probably spent 3.9 years sitting on the charger being kept at the float voltage.
Post reply on HN