The headline has important context: “YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel hours after Rudy Giuliani appeared on an episode and blamed the Capitol siege on Democrats” At some point the lies need to stop.
> At some point the lies need to stop. At some point the lies need to be brought to court.
YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
681–690 of 1001 posts
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#682Earlier quoted context omitted.
Democratic members of congress have repeatedly called for the breakup and/or regulation of "big tech", just for different reasons.
As a liberal in big tech, I can assure you the primary motivation is that we are 1. horrified by trump, always have been 2. aren't concerned that trump will unilaterally end our business if we oppose him anymore 3. are extremely concerned about american democracy and our lives, given the way trump has convinced almost half the country that the election was rigged, which has encouraged them to almost kill an entire br…
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#683Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm confused about what you're talking about. The Mueller Report didn't "find nothing." If you're unaware of this, you can read about it here: https://www.commoncause.org/resource/read-the-mueller-report... It only didn't end in legal action against Trump because of the procedural issues related to bringing charges against a sitting president. Barr made that decision, and chose to protect Trump. Your video (apparentl…
I didn't find anything. I did show that Trump is surprisingly clean. Maybe because of lacking ability, but unusually clean for a president. Cleaner than Biden in case of Ukraine for example, even if Trumps dealings are self-serving. Furthermore Bidens dealings are relevant to the US geopolitical ambitions and the censorship of it was a disgrace for the press. It keeps people uninformed, even if presentation of these…
What's the standard here? Reagan arming Contra rebels by selling arms to Iran?
Or are you comparing to the presidential campaigns for President? Are you claiming that Obama and Romney and Clinton colluded way more with foreign powers?
Or are you comparing with Biden, who profited in no way from his dealings in Ukraine?
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#684Consider this in context: No ban for fighting the wars in Iraq, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, etc. No ban for torturing people or extraordinary rendition. No ban for mass illegal spying on Americans and lying about it. No ban for droning wedding parties or hospitals. But if you dare to suggest that a political party, that cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination and spent the last four years lying about how Trump, th…
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#685Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please by all means explain how these people were being 'silenced' before that lead to an attempted coup. Back up your claims.
It’s obvious, isn’t it? Mainstream media censored Hunter Biden laptop story. They preemptively claimed that the election was 100% safe, and kept claiming that post election without any proof.
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#686Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Took 4-6 full years (if including the primaries) and 30,000 lies to grow a conscience. Arguably, it took election results. Easier to do what is right when the wind blows the right way.
No I think a violent insurrection in the Capitol was the tipping point. Up until then, all of the dangers associated with the rhetoric was theoretical.
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#687Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm confused about what you're talking about. The Mueller Report didn't "find nothing." If you're unaware of this, you can read about it here: https://www.commoncause.org/resource/read-the-mueller-report... It only didn't end in legal action against Trump because of the procedural issues related to bringing charges against a sitting president. Barr made that decision, and chose to protect Trump. Your video (apparentl…
I didn't find anything. I did show that Trump is surprisingly clean. Maybe because of lacking ability, but unusually clean for a president. Cleaner than Biden in case of Ukraine for example, even if Trumps dealings are self-serving. Furthermore Bidens dealings are relevant to the US geopolitical ambitions and the censorship of it was a disgrace for the press. It keeps people uninformed, even if presentation of these…
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#688Earlier quoted context omitted.
Should we become r/adviceanimal then?
If that's what you want to see here, then, sure.
The tone of this place _should_ be curated. We're tech, we're educated, we're start ups. If we lose that, we lose our soul.
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#689Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you not tell the difference between talking to someone and cutting off their head?
Organizing an unruly mob to target people in every aspect of their life will inevitably result in death just as much as cutting off their head will.
Re: YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
#690Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you watch CNN? For about 2 years they had cnn playing on a tv near the break room, so as I refilled my water bottle, I got to see what cnn thought was the most important (Trump) news. They spent a week on how much diet soda he drank. They had experts on saying why it could cause mental problems and that they should use the 25th on him. They spent several days when he had 2 scoops of ice cream at a White House dinn…
I too remember the uproar of Obama wearing a tan suit. Or his mustard on a burger faux pas. And the weeklong intervention into the lack of an American flag on his lapel. This is why I say both sides hide skeletons in their closet.
Its ketchup... ketchup on burgers is a faux pas.
Mayo & mustard goes on burgers, ketchup belongs in the garbage can. /r/KetchupHate users rise up!