Pretty sure 99% of regular people would be happy if there was a desktop with GNOME 2 feature parity but with a good Wayland compositor and probably some modern features that would come from that (multimonitor, VRR, ...). I just can't understand how anyone could defend GNOME 3. Their own staff have to use extensions (that break every update), even Fedora (!!!) has to patch GNOME packages now. They kept fighting that t…
> ...but with a good Wayland compositor... Up until 2020, I didn't use screen sharing all that much, so the lack of support for that wasn't a big deal with using Wayland. Now days though... this is a problem. I feel sorry for the folks running some Linux desktop that don't know why the option to start screen sharing just doesn't exist in various apps. I can imagine another Linux user saying "but it is right there!" t…
GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
421–430 of 756 posts
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#422Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ...but with a good Wayland compositor... Up until 2020, I didn't use screen sharing all that much, so the lack of support for that wasn't a big deal with using Wayland. Now days though... this is a problem. I feel sorry for the folks running some Linux desktop that don't know why the option to start screen sharing just doesn't exist in various apps. I can imagine another Linux user saying "but it is right there!" t…
To be fair, that's rather a problem of the applications not supporting Wayland. You can share within Xworld and Waylandworld, but not between them. I assume that's a non trivial problem and inherent to Wayland's design.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#423As a KDE user I wouldn't care what the Gnome people do if their BS wouldn't affect me. But it does, and it's annoying! They refuse since over a decade to implement some generic way to open the file-picker native to the running DE. They force their garbage usability on everybody, even people that would prefer not to use "anything Gnome". Same issue with CSDs, by the way. Like I said: They can have their broken stuff a…
You can actually fix that! Set GTK_USE_PORTAL=1 in your environment and then basically all your GTK apps will use the platform file picker.
Maybe someone else could confirm? This would be progress! (Even it uses some parts of Flatpak under the hood, which is less nice).
I'm a little bit skeptical as Firefox had to add support for the desktop-portal before it started to work.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#424Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#425Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#426Earlier quoted context omitted.
Recursive search instead of type-ahead search within one directory in the file picker is criminally terrible. I don't think there is any implementation of a file picker that behaves like this (other than Gtk's).
Yup - one of the many reasons I needed to stay on MATE.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#427Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, and Gnome is in part responsible for a lot of "desktop" issues with linux. Distros must switch to KDE by default to help eliminate part of this stigma. KDE is so amazingly good that there is no excuse to keep using Gnome.
I find KDE to be pretty ugly. For instance, margins and paddings seem to be all over the place [1]. At least Gnome gets that part right. [1] https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Notifications
I personally like KDE and it's Breeze Dark theme a lot.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least enough people care that its become a meme in some tech communities. https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/File_Picker_meme
Yes, and Gnome is in part responsible for a lot of "desktop" issues with linux. Distros must switch to KDE by default to help eliminate part of this stigma. KDE is so amazingly good that there is no excuse to keep using Gnome.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#429Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me this is really annoying as well, together with the stupid text input fields that may display a blinking cursor even when they're not focused. And Firefox has this weird issue that now and then a newly opened tab doesn't focus the address bar, forcing me to use the mouse to select it. And I still don't get this trend in some newer software to make tab switching via Ctrl-[Shift]-Tab feel like the lottery instead…
Ctrl+L focuses the address bar. No need to lift your fingers from the keyboard.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#430Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cut-and-paste on Finder works perfectly fine too. It's Cmd-C and then Option-Cmd-V on the destination instead of Cmd-V. Alternatively hold Option when opening the Edit menu.
That's not cut-and-paste. That's copy and some weird modified paste that, as far as I'm aware, doesn't exist anywhere else. Why completely break the existing convention?
Other file managers don't really cut and paste. They have a weird modified cut that doesn't exist anywhere else.