Live data from Hacker News

FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

tips.fbi.gov

71–80 of 152 posts

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#71
post #33

The one that's really wanted is this guy.[1] This is someone in the Senate chamber with zip-ties. This is not the retired USAF officer who was arrested with zip-ties.[2] The person in [1] is thinner, in good shape, and wearing completely different tactical gear, along with a Punisher logo on an American flag. [1] https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/protesters-enter-the-se... [2] https://images.foxtv.com/static.fox5d…

He's been ID'd already.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#72
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They don't seem to think what they did was wrong - but they also didn't seem to understand it was serious. There is a youtube video of a young woman expressing her utter shock and dismay at being maced as she literally tried to storm congress and disrupt the national democratic process. It is amazing to watch, just for how weirdly naive and entitled she is while right up saying they were trying for a revolution. What…

They think Law Enforcement and the military are on their side and that this protects them from consequences.

And they think this because of the Q conspiracy, which describes an enforcement agency inside the regular one under secret control by agents against the "Deep State."

Reality comes at you fast.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#74
post #8

funny how all the #resistance and #defundthepolice folks are actively working with the feds and law enforcement and cheering them on

It's also funny how the 'thin blue line' people ended up killing more police officers than all of the BLM protests put together and tried to crush one alive in a door. Very 'funny'.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#75
post #28

I know this one guy who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue who definitely had something to do with it. He's kinda orange and has small hands. I would make a report, but I have a feeling it won't do any good:(

Not a lawyer, but if he literally instructed the crowd to "march into the capitol chambers" then it seems like there might be a case, but if he just said something like "march to the capitol" it doesn't sound like enough to prove responsibility. Similarly "fight" could be claimed as a metaphor (e.g. college fight songs) rather than a literal incitement to violence. Etc..

He said "March to the capital". He didn't instruct them to invade.

But he did - Spend two months riling them with his grievance fantasies Call all patriots to gather for a rally Spend 70 minutes telling them their votes had been stolen and they needed to FIGHT! Tell them to march to the capitol.

It's a very fine line, and the outcome very predictable, even if he didn't explicitly tell them to invade it.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#76
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t think these people had or have any interest in being anonymous. They are standing up for what they believe in. A public display is an important part of this all, it’s part of their statement as Americans in America.

They don't seem to think what they did was wrong - but they also didn't seem to understand it was serious. There is a youtube video of a young woman expressing her utter shock and dismay at being maced as she literally tried to storm congress and disrupt the national democratic process. It is amazing to watch, just for how weirdly naive and entitled she is while right up saying they were trying for a revolution. What…

Is that the video where it appears she's rubbing an onion into her eye?

Anyway, for another example of "they also didn't seem to understand it was serious," the quote from the feet-up-on-the-desk guy:

> "I'll probably be telling them this is what happened all the way to the D.C. jail," Mr. Barnett said.

He's glib about it the same way you might be about spending a night in the drunk tank after getting a little too crazy at Mardi Gras.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#77
post #8

funny how all the #resistance and #defundthepolice folks are actively working with the feds and law enforcement and cheering them on

“Funny” how inbred arses purposefully misrepresent what “defund the police” means, and what issues people are “#resistance”-ing.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#78
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t think these people had or have any interest in being anonymous. They are standing up for what they believe in. A public display is an important part of this all, it’s part of their statement as Americans in America.

They don't seem to think what they did was wrong - but they also didn't seem to understand it was serious. There is a youtube video of a young woman expressing her utter shock and dismay at being maced as she literally tried to storm congress and disrupt the national democratic process. It is amazing to watch, just for how weirdly naive and entitled she is while right up saying they were trying for a revolution. What…

Oh you must mean [the one holding the onion in her towel?](https://youtu.be/vcaJFGQHdnA)

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#79
post #28

I know this one guy who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue who definitely had something to do with it. He's kinda orange and has small hands. I would make a report, but I have a feeling it won't do any good:(

Not a lawyer, but if he literally instructed the crowd to "march into the capitol chambers" then it seems like there might be a case, but if he just said something like "march to the capitol" it doesn't sound like enough to prove responsibility. Similarly "fight" could be claimed as a metaphor (e.g. college fight songs) rather than a literal incitement to violence. Etc..

When your governing philosophy relies on “plausible deniability” more than any other concept, it should maybe disqualify you from higher office.

Re: FBI Seeking Information Related to Violent Activity at the U.S. Capitol Building

#80
post #38
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is downvoting to censor comments something that should be against the guidelines or not?

Sorry, I downvoted because t*rr*r is a common tr*gger word for some folks. If a corporation is not morally responsible enough to censor irresponsible comments, then the community must feel empowered to do so.

So you downvoted it because the word terror might upset other people?

This is a post about an attack that killed at least 5 people.

Post reply on HN