Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still fail to see how switching from fully E2E encrypted WhatsApp to most-of-the-time NOT E2E encrypted Telegram is an improvement.
Because unlike with Facebook no one has been able to show a single example of Telegram abusing their customers even once. Let me use an example: Would you want to ride the absolutely bulletproof and soundproof taxi that has one disadvantage: that it is well known that the drivers make notes about who you are and who you visit and sell that data to companies like Cambridge Analytica? Or would you take another more ord…
Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
911–920 of 972 posts
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#912Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a Googler opinions are my own. While Google is the main implementer of RCS servers and clients, a few larger carriers have done their own implementation of it, with no need for Google. Client side, I believe Samsung had their own implementation for it? And Apple could make iMessage RCS compatible, they just have chosen not to at this point. Edit: to add, RCS does support 1:1 encryption now, though I don't believe…
> a few larger carriers have done their own implementation of it And that's why I think RCS shoot itself into the foot. I understand that Google does want to accelerate RCS implementation, and some carriers have actively chose to use Jibe. The main problem I think is that RCS is not differentiated from SMS, especially for those who have a carrier which didn't deployed it yet . In well-developed areas, it make full se…
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#913Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#914Earlier quoted context omitted.
Matrix does have a feature called Bridges which would allow you to talk to someone on WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage, etc. through your Matrix client. However, I suspect that they have some reliability issues. https://matrix.org/bridges/
> I suspect that they have some reliability issues. I've heard that they are sufficiently unreliable as to be unusable, that was was some time ago, and things may have changed.
To be clear, I send messages from my Matrix client to my Matrix server, software running on that server bridges it to WhatsApp/Signal as appropriate, same for incoming messages. Photos work as well.
I think WhatsApp relies on a data connection to your phone, and the bridge will disconnect whenever that drops. Having set this all up, I'm a pretty big convert to Matrix - just need to get the world on board. I'd love to have an SMS bridge as well, see how far I can go.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#915Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a few larger carriers have done their own implementation of it And that's why I think RCS shoot itself into the foot. I understand that Google does want to accelerate RCS implementation, and some carriers have actively chose to use Jibe. The main problem I think is that RCS is not differentiated from SMS, especially for those who have a carrier which didn't deployed it yet . In well-developed areas, it make full se…
The teleco stack will switch to IP based completely with 5G, makes no sense to keep RCS in old circuit-switched based SMS. Soon no data will mean no calls/text/anything since data will be all that telecos will provide
I need to point out that I do not really disagree with RCS' intent - but Google aggressively trying to promote RCS outside of commited carriers is not just weird but can be dangerous.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#916Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#917Earlier quoted context omitted.
Matrix, or at least Element, has terrible UX, though, and I'd never recommend it to my family. It opens three message boxes every single time I open the web client, and I can't disable these boxes permanently. Oh, and I have to login again every time because it doesn't remember logins.
What are you running Element on? These issues make no sense. I run multiple clients on several devices, not experiencing such things.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#918Earlier quoted context omitted.
The teleco stack will switch to IP based completely with 5G, makes no sense to keep RCS in old circuit-switched based SMS. Soon no data will mean no calls/text/anything since data will be all that telecos will provide
And how many years this will last? Mind you that while some countries are already solely running on 4G, there are other countries still having a large 2G phone usage and large 3G data usage. It is only fair to compare it to this - otherwise it would be unfair to those who rely on older technologies to connect to the world. I need to point out that I do not really disagree with RCS' intent - but Google aggressively tr…
Having RCS is still better than being in current situation where you're locked into Whatsapp/iMessage/Some proprietary solution from a carrier
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#919LINE [1] - is a very popular messenging app in SEA, Japan and Korea. It's more of a service suite (food delivery, news/entertainment streams etc.) but at the core it's a really good messenger. Key features that I like: - Great user-driver sticker ecosystem. Creators can submit their sets to the store and earn pasive income; there's even an sticker creation app [2] - modern, good UX and web-client with default E2E enc…