Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but in a lot of ways, the laws of society are a sufficiently objective moral basis, since those are the rules we chose for ourselves. Undermining those is just bad in so many ways.
In some cases, yes. But in other cases they just represent the view of the vocal majority or those in power. Laws are official and objective, morals are relative. It's fine to base decisions on agreed upon laws. Appealing to morality is just using your own opinions
Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
771–780 of 1001 posts
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#772This is so Facebook. * Enables and encourages (and makes money off of) spreading hate messages on their platform for years * Hamhandedly does a full reverse and bans of one of the leading spreaders only after it's too late to make a difference. * But just in time to curry favor with the groups newly in power. A twist to the old cliche: too much, too late. How cowardly.
I think you underestimate how much damage he can still do
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#773Been in tech a long time. Been on HN a long time. Over the past few years reading comments here it seems that the people are already communist and the government is just now catching up. Trump helped avoid it for a short while. Tech used to be creative, respectful, and open. I simply cannot believe the commenters here are my peers. The double speak, double standards, and vitriol toward anything Trump/conservative rel…
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#774Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#775Earlier quoted context omitted.
> all the other mass media outlets All? C'mon. You can make the argument that MSNBC is a mirror of Fox News in terms of coddling its viewers, but if you're calling NPR or the New York Times "fact-free," you're only betraying your own ignorance of journalism standards. Investigating facts and reporting them clearly is a solved problem. There are people who go to universities to study how to do this well, then go to wo…
that 'high standard' apparently allows them to present rumors from anonymous sources as facts as long as it fits a certain political agenda. The burden of evidence no longer applies neither with NYT not any other heavily biased liberal outlets like WaPo or CNN.
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#776Earlier quoted context omitted.
When you're more or less encouraging a coup, the "fire in a crowded theater" analogy couldn't be more applicable.
Stop saying it was a coup. A bunch of mostly unarmed morons weren't overtaking anything.
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#777This is so Facebook. * Enables and encourages (and makes money off of) spreading hate messages on their platform for years * Hamhandedly does a full reverse and bans of one of the leading spreaders only after it's too late to make a difference. * But just in time to curry favor with the groups newly in power. A twist to the old cliche: too much, too late. How cowardly.
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#778Earlier quoted context omitted.
yeah I'm sure this had nothing to do with the attempted coup
I don't think there is any reason to exaggerate. People have a will and a right to protest against their perceived injustice at a state or federal level. A coup also usually involves the military and a taking of government by force, neither of which happened yesterday. If this were a coup then the BLM "protests" over the summer were also a coup, and they were causing significantly more damage to small business with d…
They rushed through barricades of the legislative building during a session. This session wasn't merely "some bill" for gun control, or abolishing taxes, or amending the Constitution, or what have you.
It was the procedure of finally and officially certifying the results of an election that has been improperly questioned by the incumbent. This election has been concluded to be free of systemic fraud, or any level of fraud sufficient to flip any state. And yet these seditious citizens broke in with the intent to stop such a vote from occurring, to the extent that representatives had to flee to safety and several people died.
I personally did not support the level of property damage from the summer protests, but the differences are large. Protesting for political change through collective action, and being attacked in many instances by the very force they claim is oppressive.
The protesters in DC were attacking the will of the people, based on lies and the encouragement of the sitting President - and pretty much welcomed in by local law enforcement.
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#779Been in tech a long time. Been on HN a long time. Over the past few years reading comments here it seems that the people are already communist and the government is just now catching up. Trump helped avoid it for a short while. Tech used to be creative, respectful, and open. I simply cannot believe the commenters here are my peers. The double speak, double standards, and vitriol toward anything Trump/conservative rel…
Re: Facebook Indefinitely Suspends Trump
#780Earlier quoted context omitted.
What policies he pushed you are not happy with? Less taxes, no new wars, and leaving each state making their own decisions for covid-19 seems pretty center right to me.
> Less taxes, My taxes went up. > leaving each state making their own decisions for covid-19 This one especially.
It's so infuriating that this BS would pass for some sort of Trump accolade. The country is in full-blown crisis, the likes of which we haven't seen in a century. Why should the president do anything? He let the states handle it. What a great leader!