Live data from Hacker News

Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

cnn.com

301–310 of 460 posts

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#301

I find it sad that a good chunk of HN seems to just go with the "she's a toxic person" narrative without ever relaying what she actually DID. Ironically, the self identified "anti-SJW" are cancelling her by complaining about her "toxicity" and "attempts to cancel people" in vague terms. I also find it sad that apparently, freedom of speech and free actions end when it comes to criticizing your employer in public, sho…

They don't end, she was free to make her statements. Google was free to exit her for doing so.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#303
post #267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's possible that the company's values or behaviour have changed, but, more importantly, the decision to work at a company is mutual: both sides want it (the company expects the value an employee will bring exceeds the cost of their employment; hiring someone is not a charity), and they enter into this relationship when neither side knows everything about the other, certainly not how they would behave in the future.…

I don't disagree with you. I was at an adtech startup, and I had bright lines — no payday loans or for-profit education. Luckily we never needed to blur or cross those lines, but as our business evolved, the way I delivered my — and my colleagues delivered their— preferences was not through laying down ultimatums but by having conversations. Some people seem intent on creating drama and casting things not as their pr…

Maybe, but I don't know enough details or background about this situation to debate over its nuances. I'm just criticising the views I see expressed here, that are bizarre even from a capitalistic perspective, that a corporation may do anything legal and will be judged by the market, while employees doing the same -- whether it's smart or not -- is crossing some line.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#304
post #301

I find it sad that a good chunk of HN seems to just go with the "she's a toxic person" narrative without ever relaying what she actually DID. Ironically, the self identified "anti-SJW" are cancelling her by complaining about her "toxicity" and "attempts to cancel people" in vague terms. I also find it sad that apparently, freedom of speech and free actions end when it comes to criticizing your employer in public, sho…

They don't end, she was free to make her statements. Google was free to exit her for doing so.

I think that will be up for the the national labor board or whoever judges the legality of this. In any case now people, including her co-worker are free in condemning Google for that. Let's hope either Google can address the grievances and prove/convince people they are in the right, or if they can't that it will have consequences beyond a Twitter shit storm.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#305
post #299
post #288

I can't say I feel for Google, they've had it coming. A completely self-inflicted wound. What worries me is the woke culture creeping over from Google to other companies, and from US to other countries . Demanding vice-presidents be fired, taking over companies like a virus. But how can the virus stay alive while killing its hosts so vehemently? What will sustain it long-term?

> But how can the virus stay alive while killing its hosts so vehemently? Comparing a company to a host and the employees that create its wealth to a virus is illogical even for the most ardent capitalist. Isn't the capitalist idea that everyone, be it the employer or the worker, do their utmost to maximise their market value and use it to the best of their ability to their own advantage? Even the ancien régime reali…

Note that the parent don't compare ALL of the employees to virus, only the one propagating 'woke culture'

If you follow the metaphore, the employees are cells of the host, and those cells can be infected by the woke culture virus and start acting against the host while propagating the virus to other cells within the host.

You can very certainly disagree with the 'woke culture is a virus' part, but except from that the metaphor stands imho

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#307

This issue reminds me a lot of what we do in security and privacy, which are ostensibly engineering disciplines, but are really technology governance functions. Ethical AI is also a governance function, and like hackers in security, there is an invisible yet stark limit to the value activists can provide in actual governance roles. Litigating demands is just not how governance gets done. The irony of Google hiring so…

I wish I had more upvotes to give for this comment. It gave me multiple upsights about how to clean up my approach thinking about the issues here: + framing an analogy using technology governance functions - whose functions and values can be clearly quantified and measured by many independently - with a ethical (moral) functions - whose values and results are much more nebulous + drawing a parallel between hackers -…

I read an interesting article that argued modern activists learned how to protest on college campuses which are unique due to the influence the student/activists wield. And that when these activists protest later in life they are not as prepared for the more challenging environment where your antagonist is unsympathetic to your cause.

This seems to be playing out here. I can't really see how Google could acquiesce to their demands without setting themselves up for this tactic to be used against them in the future.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#308
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was, yes. Public statements she made before getting fired include: > A Black woman can't survive around here doing any type of research let alone research thats designed to make those in the majority uncomfortable. And guess who can apparently unilaterally order you to do things without even thinking you're someone they should converse with. ( https://twitter.com/timnitGebru/status/1331757629996109824 ) > [The VPs…

A black woman? How is she black?

> A black woman? How is she black?

She's not “black” nor was that claimed; she’s “Black”. The first is a common adjective that never really applies to humans except very loosely, the second is a racial identity group formed by and defined largely through oppression by European and (in US usage; usage and identity elsewhere has evolved through different local forces and experiences) later European-descended American bigots, that has only loose correlation to complexion, ultimately starting with the division of humanity (by people in the last of these groups) fairly arbitrarily into the three broad racial groups of Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid, which later evolved into White, Black, and the last split into Asian and Native American.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#309
post #299
post #288

I can't say I feel for Google, they've had it coming. A completely self-inflicted wound. What worries me is the woke culture creeping over from Google to other companies, and from US to other countries . Demanding vice-presidents be fired, taking over companies like a virus. But how can the virus stay alive while killing its hosts so vehemently? What will sustain it long-term?

> But how can the virus stay alive while killing its hosts so vehemently? Comparing a company to a host and the employees that create its wealth to a virus is illogical even for the most ardent capitalist. Isn't the capitalist idea that everyone, be it the employer or the worker, do their utmost to maximise their market value and use it to the best of their ability to their own advantage? Even the ancien régime reali…

The way I understand his point is that he is comparing the woke culture to the virus, not the workers themselves. I am guessing that there are plenty of Google’s employees who are not a part of the woke movement. He would not be addressing them in his point, I think.

Re: Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it sends demands to CEO

#310
post #222
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Didn't they push back on the publication because the paper was lacking in certain regards? IIRC it failed to take into account relevant recent papers, for example. Which probably could have been fixed if they didn't submit as late as they did.

According to current and former Google employees on various machine learning forums, Google does not do an academic review on their employee’s papers. That is the job of the journal reviewers. Google usually just checks whether any proprietary IP has accidentally made it in. For them to claim anything different is comically dishonest.

Not true, see christian's tweet. It's also obvious that a paper like this one will receive more scrutiny than a technical one.
Post reply on HN