Right Dao, a new independent search engine that doesn't track users
41–50 of 51 posts
Re: Right Dao, a new independent search engine that doesn't track users
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have our own crawler and indexing.
Have you considered using Common Crawl [1], and if so, what was your assessment when compared to having your own spyders? Long-term, a combination of theirs and your own could be optimal. There are strengths and weaknesses with using their dumps: on one hand, benefits include them having crawled and having dealt with being throttled, etc. They offer monthly dumps for general content and daily dumps for news [2]. On t…
Re: Right Dao, a new independent search engine that doesn't track users
#43Re: Right Dao, a new independent search engine that doesn't track users
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually, that's not really true. If you don't store any user information, you're compliant. It's only if you start storing those that you have some rules to follow. Nowadays, it's the same if you are in California with the recent data protection laws. Also, Right Dao is under New York law, so it has to follow US law I guess.
"If you don't store any user information, you're compliant." So, how do I do business with people?
It's not about not having information, it's about having consent before acquiring it.
Re: Right Dao, a new independent search engine that doesn't track users
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
"If you don't store any user information, you're compliant." So, how do I do business with people?
That is a horribly wrong view point. Information required for business purposes, e.g. to write invoices or file taxes is considered user information you are fine to retain. It's not about not having information, it's about having consent before acquiring it.