Live data from Hacker News

We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

techcrunch.com

71–80 of 104 posts

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#71

Tell me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the parts alone cost around $200. I am not saying that this is impossible, but reliable batteries alone have got to be pretty expensive.

the price point we are at in our spec already is at $150 so we have left $50 or more to add cooler shit

There is a huge difference between a $200 device and a device whose bill of materials happens to be $200...

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#72

Isn't he basically describing an iPod Touch with a bigger screen?

... but only wants to pay $200 for it.

He will get his for free of course, as will a bunch of celebs and media tech "stars" etc. etc., but the rest of us will be the ones who have to pay for it.

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#73

My two main thoughts on this are: 1. It won't cost $200. The Nokia N810 has similar specs and had a price drop to $300, so I don't see how this will happen. It might be possible to source the parts for 200, but not build it, ship it and make a profit. 2. Why not use Ubuntu MID? I have not used it, but it was made for these kind of devices. Certainly much easier and cheaper than writing custom linux/ff code. Just add…

No, The Nokia N810 has NOT similar specs. If nothing else, it has keyboard.

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#74
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't mean that hardware has to remain hard forever. Maybe something could be done to make it simpler. Some things already have been done. For example, it is very simple to build your own PC out of readymade components.

By hard, we don't mean "difficult to understand and master"; one can learn electronics on his own in the same way he can learn programming. The tools and skills required are on par with software (well, the tools are usually better); it's just that hardware requires much more capital and time to build, and you have to deal with a lot of logistics and business issues. A small team with no capital can build a ready-to-s…

And I think that can change, for example because of Rapid Prototyping, Build On Demand and so on.

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#75
post #31

Back at the 2001 Comdex, Bill Gates announced that by 2007, such devices would be the most popular form of PC in the U.S. Although his timing was off, I think Gates was definitely on to something. Yet as brm notes, it's probably going to take more than just the open source community. Open source seems great for advancing the bleeding-edge; but honestly, unless money is on the line, how many devs are going to cut out…

In Gates' 1996 'The Road Ahead' he was talking about the convergence of devices to what seemed like a mobile, touch screen web browser (within 5 years, a bit optimistic).

He talks about the wallet pc, a sketch of which looks like an iphone in landscape mode.

Why didn't Microsoft try this?

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#76
post #64
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Admiring's fine, it's criticizing that I have a problem with. It takes all of half a second to say "Twitter stability sucks," but it takes a LOT more work to actually make a Twitter that is stable. Anyone can say what's wrong with the world.

This sounds to me like you are implying that journalism is a less important profession, since they are only criticizing things and writing about them, and not actually change them directly? Or, I don't get your point... (ok, Arrington is something between journalist and a blogger, but my objection still applies).

Fine. If noone wants to say it, I will.

In my opinion, Journalism is a less important profession. Why? Because it depends on the movers. Arrington's job would not exist if there weren't people out starting companies. Journalism cannot exist in a vacuum.

Also, I would argue that journalism (as we know it) does not create value. Rather, it is an arbitrageur of information.

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#77
post #10

He really is just describing a Nokia N810 tablet. When a reader suggested that, Arrington replied: "yes, although we want to build it a lot cheaper and have a much bigger screen." So, he expects to replicate the N810, but with a bigger screen and better price? How is he going to beat Nokia and still make a profit?

I don't think he cares about the profit portion.

Okay, cool. In that case I'll take two.

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#78
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... but only wants to pay $200 for it.

He will get his for free of course, as will a bunch of celebs and media tech "stars" etc. etc., but the rest of us will be the ones who have to pay for it.

As long as it's only $200, I don't mind...

Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.

#80
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where are you getting the screen?

our supply chain guys sourced it - we haven't set yet if we are going LCD or exact specific specs (we need to run power tests). the dual touch pad sitting behind it is coming out of a company that hasn't seen their tech integrated into a major product yet. im sorry we cant mention company names just yet - we are doing this through proxy (ie. using a supply chain company, design firm and manufacturer). I am hoping I c…

I really hope the screen company is Pixel Qi. Here is their prediction for a touchscreen price:

"INTEGRATED TOUCHSCREENS

Touch should just be an incremental cost increase to the screen and embedded directly into it. Pixel Qi is working on low-cost approachs to integrated touch with a target of a $5 -$10 pricetag." (http://pixelqi.com/products)

Post reply on HN