Tell me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the parts alone cost around $200. I am not saying that this is impossible, but reliable batteries alone have got to be pretty expensive.
the price point we are at in our spec already is at $150 so we have left $50 or more to add cooler shit
We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
71–80 of 104 posts
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#72Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#73My two main thoughts on this are: 1. It won't cost $200. The Nokia N810 has similar specs and had a price drop to $300, so I don't see how this will happen. It might be possible to source the parts for 200, but not build it, ship it and make a profit. 2. Why not use Ubuntu MID? I have not used it, but it was made for these kind of devices. Certainly much easier and cheaper than writing custom linux/ff code. Just add…
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't mean that hardware has to remain hard forever. Maybe something could be done to make it simpler. Some things already have been done. For example, it is very simple to build your own PC out of readymade components.
By hard, we don't mean "difficult to understand and master"; one can learn electronics on his own in the same way he can learn programming. The tools and skills required are on par with software (well, the tools are usually better); it's just that hardware requires much more capital and time to build, and you have to deal with a lot of logistics and business issues. A small team with no capital can build a ready-to-s…
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#75Back at the 2001 Comdex, Bill Gates announced that by 2007, such devices would be the most popular form of PC in the U.S. Although his timing was off, I think Gates was definitely on to something. Yet as brm notes, it's probably going to take more than just the open source community. Open source seems great for advancing the bleeding-edge; but honestly, unless money is on the line, how many devs are going to cut out…
He talks about the wallet pc, a sketch of which looks like an iphone in landscape mode.
Why didn't Microsoft try this?
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Admiring's fine, it's criticizing that I have a problem with. It takes all of half a second to say "Twitter stability sucks," but it takes a LOT more work to actually make a Twitter that is stable. Anyone can say what's wrong with the world.
This sounds to me like you are implying that journalism is a less important profession, since they are only criticizing things and writing about them, and not actually change them directly? Or, I don't get your point... (ok, Arrington is something between journalist and a blogger, but my objection still applies).
In my opinion, Journalism is a less important profession. Why? Because it depends on the movers. Arrington's job would not exist if there weren't people out starting companies. Journalism cannot exist in a vacuum.
Also, I would argue that journalism (as we know it) does not create value. Rather, it is an arbitrageur of information.
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#77He really is just describing a Nokia N810 tablet. When a reader suggested that, Arrington replied: "yes, although we want to build it a lot cheaper and have a much bigger screen." So, he expects to replicate the N810, but with a bigger screen and better price? How is he going to beat Nokia and still make a profit?
I don't think he cares about the profit portion.
Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#78Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#79Re: We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet. Help Us Build It.
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where are you getting the screen?
our supply chain guys sourced it - we haven't set yet if we are going LCD or exact specific specs (we need to run power tests). the dual touch pad sitting behind it is coming out of a company that hasn't seen their tech integrated into a major product yet. im sorry we cant mention company names just yet - we are doing this through proxy (ie. using a supply chain company, design firm and manufacturer). I am hoping I c…
"INTEGRATED TOUCHSCREENS
Touch should just be an incremental cost increase to the screen and embedded directly into it. Pixel Qi is working on low-cost approachs to integrated touch with a target of a $5 -$10 pricetag." (http://pixelqi.com/products)