E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
101–110 of 137 posts
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#102Doesn't /e/ just take Lineage OS, install microg on top of it add their crappy launcher, and then take $$$ as donations. If anyone deserves donations its Lineage or MicroG. Donate upstream instead of this.
See also https://community.e.foundation/t/microg-what-you-need-to-kno...
I think part of their approach is also to sell refurbished phones (or, in partnership with Fairphone, new ones) with /e/ preinstalled, lowering the barrier to entry. There might be more, but I'm not too familiar with them.
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#103/e/ is mud among the LineageOS community (which is upstream of it), due to several reasons. Sadly I can't find the relevant /r/lineageOS posts . Here's some reading that covers the basic points though: https://intangiblesheep.neocities.org/rants/eelo.html https://web.archive.org/web/20191224031946/https://ewwlo.xyz...
I kinda agree with the sentiment in the articles from an AOSP/lineage/cyanogen perspective. They should definitely embrace the Telegram FOSS fork [1] and OSMAnd~ [2] (which is a superb offline navigation tool btw) and remove all Apps that require the Android 10 firebase hockey-based notifications. [5] and [6] A lot of apps use this for convenience and because it was _required_ since AOSP 10 but there are ways to work…
Those are all completely stubbed out in Tor Browser Android. I helped with some work on that a few years back.
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original developer of CopperheadOS is continuing the work as GrapheneOS, after a split with his former business partner, over dilutions of the privacy guarantees, among other things. https://grapheneos.org/
Always feels like treading google for some other random developers
Micay, of GrapheneOS and original creator of CopperheadOS, is not some random. They have pushed AOSP security ahead and have made many upstream contributions over the years.
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#105Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#106There were several privacy problems with this ROM, not sure if they corrected it. https://infosec-handbook.eu/blog/e-foundation-first-look/
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#107Had me until it mentioned "the cloud" Does it force you to have data on the cloud? Or can you get by without using the cloud? Simply put: I don't want anyone having my data anywhere apart from me and my device.
I've been using it for a few weeks: It doesn't force you to put anything on the cloud. If you choose to create an /e/ account, it makes it easy to sync/backup to their cloud services, but it's completely optional. Unlike Google or Apple, you're not required to create a cloud account just to use your own device.
... asking for a friend ...
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#108One of the things that feels a bit problematic here - the webpage is avoiding mention of the fact that this is still Android. In essence, this is still Google's OS and the team has decided to start a fight against Google by taking their opensource and perpetually fight against the main developer by removing their proprietary component. I don't think this is a fight that's sustainable - a giant graveyard of Android pr…
On the other hand by being Android you get to run all the Android apps out there. What I seek in a phone is control over my privacy, not necessarily a vegan FOSS system. What that means is things like: - Fine-grained control of permissions to apps (e.g. access to rear camera only, access to only city-level accuracy of locations, access to read from only directories I specify) - For apps that insist on having permissi…
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
On the other hand by being Android you get to run all the Android apps out there. What I seek in a phone is control over my privacy, not necessarily a vegan FOSS system. What that means is things like: - Fine-grained control of permissions to apps (e.g. access to rear camera only, access to only city-level accuracy of locations, access to read from only directories I specify) - For apps that insist on having permissi…
so much this! I want XPrivacy out of the box, and whats with the blocking me from recording my own calls? I want that too.
Re: E Foundation – deGoogled unGoogled smartphone OS and online services
#110/e/ is mud among the LineageOS community (which is upstream of it), due to several reasons. Sadly I can't find the relevant /r/lineageOS posts . Here's some reading that covers the basic points though: https://intangiblesheep.neocities.org/rants/eelo.html https://web.archive.org/web/20191224031946/https://ewwlo.xyz...
I kinda agree with the sentiment in the articles from an AOSP/lineage/cyanogen perspective. They should definitely embrace the Telegram FOSS fork [1] and OSMAnd~ [2] (which is a superb offline navigation tool btw) and remove all Apps that require the Android 10 firebase hockey-based notifications. [5] and [6] A lot of apps use this for convenience and because it was _required_ since AOSP 10 but there are ways to work…