Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Though I find that many Raven's progressive matrices-type questions are a lot easier if you know about symmetry groups and XOR. Yes, at that point people who have already developed certain mindware have an advantage, but arguably that's the point of an IQ test. You're not testing the potential of a person to eventually be really smart, you're testing for the current problem-solving potential.
Well, it is problem, because the assumption is that you're measuring a proxy for g that supposedly doesn't change. So if it can change, by something as simple as learning some boolean algebra, the IQ test isn't measuring what it is assumed to be measuring. That being said, you're right that it would still be useful for measuring problem solving potential, but that's explicitly not what IQ tests are supposed to measur…
CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
511–520 of 700 posts
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#512Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks, will check it out.
Not sure if that's still a problem, but when I tried this addon some time ago, audio captchas were quickly disabled for me because of irregular activity from my network. It might not be a good idea to use this if you rely on audio captchas and can't easily change your IP address.
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#513Yes, the American focus of the internet is absolutely appalling. Assumptions of timezones - PST, CST and the others whatever they are. Northern hemisphere assumptions of seasons - fall, etc - in the southern hemisphere the seasons are the opposite and we don't use the word fall. Even Apple, known for its "sensitivity" to cultural matters has a big miss on this one.
and 12-hour clocks. I can never remember if "am" morning or afternoon. Why is 12am before 1am? Makes no sense at all.
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#514Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even so, it's easy to make a mistake with that much information so poorly organized. There are better alternatives out there, like this: https://www.lamag.com/driver/hidden-costs-parking-signs-easy...
Would be even better with 24-hour clock.
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#515Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tangentially, we've been having fun with this recently. "Why haven't you completed Active Shooter Training?" "I'm busy, prioritising my time, and this training is irrelevant to me." "But what if there's an Active Shooter in the office?" "I've been working at home since April, and I've already been told to expect 6 months more." "It could still happen at home!" "What country do you think we're in?" Head Office seems t…
Wait, there is actually something like mandatory Active Shooter Training in US companies? For real?
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#516As a blind person with english as not native language, the audio captchas are pure hell. I can't imagine other visually impaired people who don't know english at all and have to deal with a lazy website which dumps them the default english audio captcha if there is audio at all.
Is there a way I could contact you privetly ?
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#517Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have driven all over the US, and while roundabouts (aka traffic circles) are more common in the northeast, they’re common enough all over that I doubt anyone would struggle with that captcha. /Maybe/ some people would trip over the wording (expecting traffic circle and unfamiliar with “roundabout”).
We always called them roundabouts, though “traffic circle” would have been easily understood. Maybe it’s a regional thing (I’m from Arizona).
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#518Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#519What’s more fun is being American and intentionally misinterpreting the captcha. Select all street lights? Then think of how that question could be translated and misread in another language. Then select everything that would qualify as a light on the street: lamps, car headlights, crossing signals, et al. Sometimes I select a square that I think the machine placed in the set to get more certainty but doesn’t match.…
To me it's not a game and not fun at all (I use Tor so I've seen more edge cases than most people). I found CAPTCHA is a school quiz. Some questions are ambiguous and open to interpretation, if it happens, it's not important to select the "correct" answer, but the "expected" answer. - Select all squares with $object. If $object only occupies 1/2 or 1/3 of a square, should I select it or not? The "correct" answer is s…
What you’re describing is what led me exactly to intentionally give bad results. When I give bad results, I'm not permanently denied entry. Instead, the data is sent back to Google and it notes that decision and I get to try again. If enough people were to always select all 3 squares, or an entire road that you can walk across rather than a painted crossing marks, or whatever false positive, then Google Captcha’s idea of a correct answer is more broad.
I can’t get rid of captcha. However, since it’s a data training game, I can try to eliminate the issues as much as possible by feeding it extra data so that people don’t have the 1/3 tiles question.
That question is difficult to answer because captcha has no rules. This is because it’s not actually used to identify if you’re human or a bot, that’s a side effect.
Re: CAPTCHAs don’t prove you’re human – they prove you’re American (2017)
#520Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXBHY7uco0Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw "Really? 'erbs? You're french now?"