Live data from Hacker News

Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

notepad-plus-plus.org

151–160 of 185 posts

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#151

Dear moderators, could it be possible to revert to the original title of the post ? I think the title is the topic, not a minor release of Notepad++.

Ok, but a minor release of software with a political cause attached is not an on-topic HN submission.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#152
post #151

Dear moderators, could it be possible to revert to the original title of the post ? I think the title is the topic, not a minor release of Notepad++.

Ok, but a minor release of software with a political cause attached is not an on-topic HN submission. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Sorry, my bad.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are even worse. Why can't we let political discourse stay in political spaces? That used to be the norm and everyone was far less stressed out and amicable for it. Now every space has become a battleground for sociopolitical discourse and we're drawing lines everywhere.

Standing against discrimination, whether it's taking the form of racism, sexism, homophobia, or something else, isn't a political act. It's a human rights act.

Humans have a right to ownership of their property which includes their bodies and who they interact with.

That includes having the right to discriminate. While it may be unkind, it is a greater evil to force someone to interact with someone they don’t want to, even if it’s for reasons of race, sex, living gay, or just being ugly, mean, old or young, or any other reason.

Only in an unfree world there is no discrimination.

I’m reminded of a tattoo I once saw written in runes: “free men are not equal; equal men are not free”.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#154

I use Notepad++ on Windows. Never cared for its author, let alone the author's beliefs.

Why the down-vote? It seems related to the other comments, and I do not see why I must care about the author of the software or their views. If ReiserFS was good (for my use cases), I would use it, although in that case I know some about the author, but only because it was quite the news around some circles.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#155
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Washington Post is just as bad: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50205592

Goddamn, there's no way this wasn't intentional. Imagine if Fox News had called Dylann Roof something like a "mild-mannered young man", we would have never heard the end of that. Frightening to see that from the Post.

The whole of the US press has been behaving like absolute cowards when it comes to caricatures and islam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-yYhq3nOng

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#157
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume an overwhelming majority of National Front voters don't want people like him out, they just don't want their salaries dumped and their teachers beheaded. Also, it's not the first time this guy uses his influence as the leader of a popular project to push his politics. It's getting boring.

As a french: your assumption is wrong.

As a french: “as a french” is incorrect english. That does not mean anything.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Makes me wonder if he's considered putting anything in the code to prevent it... Perhaps someone should test a few racist phrases with wireshark on?

Yes...because everyone knows that the best way to find out what open source software is doing is to fire up wireshark and type out racism... Totally no other way.

...ah. I forgot it was open source. Stupid me.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are even worse. Why can't we let political discourse stay in political spaces? That used to be the norm and everyone was far less stressed out and amicable for it. Now every space has become a battleground for sociopolitical discourse and we're drawing lines everywhere.

To me, it's an integral part of celebrity. We expect them to be role models, give up their privacy and generally hold them to higher standards, so why shouldn't they be able to use their fame to support something they believe in?

> We expect them to be role models

This seems like an odd expectation since so few of them have functional relationships and are an endless source of scandal.

Also, literally nothing about their profession makes them an authority on any political, social, or human rights issue.

Re: Notepad++ 7.9.1 – pour Samuel Paty

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are even worse. Why can't we let political discourse stay in political spaces? That used to be the norm and everyone was far less stressed out and amicable for it. Now every space has become a battleground for sociopolitical discourse and we're drawing lines everywhere.

Standing against discrimination, whether it's taking the form of racism, sexism, homophobia, or something else, isn't a political act. It's a human rights act.

The political opinions of celebrities popular on social media goes far beyond the human rights issues they discuss.

Most of them are simply pushing specific candidates, without even a mention of any human rights issue at all.

Post reply on HN