Maybe I'm too libertarian-leaning, but doesn't the author of the article have the option of NOT driving for Uber? If California is truly one of the wealthiest economies, the author should be able to find a different line of work.
Maybe I'm too left-leaning, but doesn't it feel wrong to deny people the possibility of seeing a doctor, calling in sick if they don't feel good or earning enough money to afford more than Ramen at the end of the month, no matter their line of work? It's great that the HN crowd is primarily privileged from an income point of view, but I find it hard to fathom that people lose sight of the fact that not everyone is th…
It does feel wrong to deny people the possibility of seeing a doctor.
It does feel wrong that some people can't afford basic necessities.
Why do you insist on drawing a line around people who have found employment and saying that they deserve these things, but if they don't have employment they deserve a second, lesser system?
If people don't have healthcare and you think they should - provide healthcare, don't try to make someone else do so.
If people don't have money and you think they should - give them money, don't require others to pay more to those people who can get a job.
Maybe tying benefits to employment and subsistence levels of cash to employment are a bad way to solve the problems you claim to care about.