Also, mb air has no touch bar, but includes fingerprint scanner. I’m sure a lot hackernews will be pleased with that, despite it not being in a machine with the pro moniker.
Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
281–290 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
Holy cow, that's true. New 2020 Mini with a 16GB RAM, seriously?
Especially head scratching when you consider that a lot of folks still have 2012 Mac minis with 16GB of RAM. I think 16GB is the bare minimum for a professional machine. Apple clears the bar here, but doesn't exceed it. Maybe next year's machines? As a first product, I think it's good enough. And the performance gains elsewhere--if what Apple says is true--are actually pretty radically impressive.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#283Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess the cooling let’s them tweak the CPU clocks accordingly? Wonder if we can hack the Mac mini with water blocks and squeeze higher clocks. The memory limitation makes it a dud though.
8GB and 16GB configurations seem more than enough..
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#285So I guess Windows won't run on M1, so none of my Windows software/Steam games will work either. Will software developers start dropping support for Mac now that they'd need to maintain an ARM version as well? It's not clear how long Apple will support emulation with Rosetta before cutting it off. What's the Linux landscape look like for this chip? It's great that there's performance and battery life improvements, bu…
Edit: Never-mind, it looks like they are not porting bootcamp.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#286The pricing is pretty impressive. Shame no 16 inch pro though. Surely they need to update that quick because who is going to want a 16 inch intel Mac now?
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#287Completely unconfirmed speculation incoming: There's a solid chance that the logic board is exactly the same on all of the Macs announced today and the only difference is the cooling solution. If you play around with the Apple Store configurator, the specs are all suspiciously similar between every new Mac. https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-air https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/13-inch https://w…
I noticed the slides kept saying "Up to" 8 GPU cores. That left me wondering if there are different variants of the M1 with different core counts. (Note: It always said 8 CPU cores)
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#288Max 16GB of RAM on these new machines is really not that great to be honest. The mini supported up to 64GB before.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#289I'm very curious to see some real benchmarks. I have no doubt that they've achieved state of the art efficiency using 5nm, but I have a harder time believing that they can outperform the highest end of AMD and Intel's mobile offerings by so much (especially without active cooling). Their completely unit-less graph axes are really something...
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's 8-core, but they're 4 performance and 4 low-power cores, so it's not your normal 8-core chip. It's more like a big.LITTLE chip.
Anyone know how you interact with these cores as a developer/user? Say if I'm running some C code with OpenMP parallelism, can I bind it to three of the fast cores?
There isn't an option like taskset on Linux to pin or move tasks among different cores, or like anything that's exposed in Linux's sysfs.