Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
lynalden.com
Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
1–10 of 249 posts
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#2https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#3I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
Quite BS imo
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#4I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
Well he said it was MMT, didn't he? ;)
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#5I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#6I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
You think we had it bad, check out what happened here: https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/great-depression/
I seem to remember something else, rather alarming, that happened after that...
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
Have you in the process also just wiped out everyone on a fixed income and who keep their savings in the bank?
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#8I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo
Have you in the process also just wiped out everyone on a fixed income and who keep their savings in the bank?
Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing
#10I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...
The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo