Live data from Hacker News

Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

lynalden.com

1–10 of 249 posts

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#3

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way.

Quite BS imo

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#4

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

> Quite BS imo

Well he said it was MMT, didn't he? ;)

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#5

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

Have you in the process also just wiped out everyone on a fixed income and who keep their savings in the bank?

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#6

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

Printing money is a bad idea.

You think we had it bad, check out what happened here: https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/great-depression/

I seem to remember something else, rather alarming, that happened after that...

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

Have you in the process also just wiped out everyone on a fixed income and who keep their savings in the bank?

Yep, and it’s arguably half the point as a means to keep the workforce working, depending on the leaning of who you talk to.

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#8

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

What’s BS about it? Using inflation to cheapen debts is pretty common knowledge.

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#9
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

Have you in the process also just wiped out everyone on a fixed income and who keep their savings in the bank?

Isn’t that what people want? To eliminate rent-seeking behavior?

Re: Banks, QE, and Money-Printing

#10

I recommend Stephanie Kelton's "The Deficit Myth" for more background on MMT: https://www.amazon.com/Deficit-Myth-Monetary-Peoples-Economy...

The point of that woman is simply: let the deficit go up ad infinitum (in USD value), it doesn't matter because as the central bank keeps printing money, the value of the deficit actually goes down (because the USD value goes down), so the value of the deficit is stable even if we don't perceive it to be this way. Quite BS imo

Yet it’s very tempting for politicians to implement exactly that, because to tax people to pay for stuff is not very popular politically. They will always, always, always kick the can down the road.
Post reply on HN