Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

boingboing.net

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 62 posts

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#31

Post by namanyayg »

bryanrasmussen wrote: post #28
bArray wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Satire) Meanwhile, in the Kremlin, Putin orders that one nuclear code digit be inserted into the hearts of 20 men. There was widespread controversy when Putin forced them to remove it themselves in a practice fire drill last week. A Kremlin official responded: "Using 20 men has reduced our nuclear response time by 20 times".

wait - does this mean that each heart has a digit and you need to kill 20 men to get the complete code, in which case I would expect response time to increase or does it mean that each of the men has a redundant code so that in case one of them is on the toilet they can still kill another one and fire the nukes without any delays?

the joke is that Putin has ordered the innocents to "remove it themselves" in a fire drill.

Compare 1 individual taking out digits one by one vs 20 individuals taking out 1 digit each.

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#32

Post by somethingwitty1 »

bryanrasmussen wrote: post #28
bArray wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Satire) Meanwhile, in the Kremlin, Putin orders that one nuclear code digit be inserted into the hearts of 20 men. There was widespread controversy when Putin forced them to remove it themselves in a practice fire drill last week. A Kremlin official responded: "Using 20 men has reduced our nuclear response time by 20 times".

wait - does this mean that each heart has a digit and you need to kill 20 men to get the complete code, in which case I would expect response time to increase or does it mean that each of the men has a redundant code so that in case one of them is on the toilet they can still kill another one and fire the nukes without any delays?

I think it is that they were forced to kill themselves. So 20 at once, rather than one at a time.

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#33

Post by bserge »

bArray wrote: post #21
tgv wrote: post #4

Here's your writing prompt for today: Meanwhile, in the Kremlin ...

(Satire) Meanwhile, in the Kremlin, Putin orders that one nuclear code digit be inserted into the hearts of 20 men. There was widespread controversy when Putin forced them to remove it themselves in a practice fire drill last week. A Kremlin official responded: "Using 20 men has reduced our nuclear response time by 20 times".

If they had a law mandating an innocent person must be killed to obtain the codes, in true soviet style, Putin would just shoot a random person and then use the codes (that are always with him). Efficient and technically lawful.

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#34

Post by andreareina »

ashtonkem wrote: post #26
number6 wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was one of the greatest hacking ever done by a US President. Sad that it had to come to this but thats on the Democrats. I bet Biden would be to weak to do it. But you can't be weak when it comes to defending the nation. America First! Yep... I can imagine the face...

This feels like a Poe’s law moment.

That's the problem with Poe's law, you can never be sure.

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#35

Post by newswasboring »

andreareina wrote: post #34
ashtonkem wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This feels like a Poe’s law moment.

That's the problem with Poe's law, you can never be sure.

That's not a problem, that _is_ Poe's Law. That you can't be sure.

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#39

Post by dotancohen »

hedora wrote: post #3
ncmncm wrote: post #2

For the past multiple decades the "launch code" was known throughout the officer corps to be, simply, 00000000000000000. I.e., the whole "nuclear football" scheme was a PR stunt. There is no reason to think its substance has changed.

True, but can you imagine the look on the president's face after he hacked someone's chest open to find out that was the code?

  > True, but can you imagine the look on the
  > president's face after he hacked someone's
  > chest open to find out that was the code?
That's the combination on my luggage!

Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)

#40

Post by YeGoblynQueenne »

Well, the President has men in his service who have killed people before and would not hesitate to do it again at the President's order, be the target innocent or not. So the President would never have to bloody his or her hands and the whole trick would only cost one more senseless death, among the millions to follow immediately after.

But I suppose it's an interesting reflection on the moral implications of granting one person enough power to destroy the entire world.

I'd rather wonder though - can anyone be said to hold such power legitimately, when they have only been given this power by a small minority of the entire population that is potentially affected by the decision (i.e. the US citizens, as opposed to the whole of humanity)?

Post reply on HN