Live data from Hacker News

White Women Need Not Apply

arcdigital.media

51–60 of 129 posts

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#52
post #11

A lot of drama here that seems to spill out into real life. Two opposing sides. But, they're largely on the same side it seems like. One seems to have made a mistake in submitting her article unknowingly to a blog that doesn't accept articles from white women, and the other wasn't happy about this or the tone from the first person.

> made a mistake in submitting her article unknowingly to a blog that doesn't accept articles from white women

I am still pretty aghast that the liberal side thinks that is acceptable without irony.

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#53

I don't mean this as a joke, but I'm actually rather hesitant to express any thoughts on this after reading it. I'll just leave it at that.

I can only think of few more radioactive topics and just like in WarGames: The only winning move is not to play.

EDIT: A more nuanced answer less prone to misinterpretation: I don't think there's a clear good answer w.r.t the topic at hand because no matter how you answer, even the most well-meaning and best-argumented answer would be, well, prone to misinterpretation.

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#54
post #32

Is Senji Sojwal a pseudonym? I can’t seem to find that this is a real person. When searching for “Senji Sojwal” in a search engine, this article is the only result returned.

It was misspelt in the article. If you clicked through to the Twitter thread you'll see that her name is Senti, not Senji.

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#55
post #39

"I am really tired of white women's tears." This is a plainly racist comment.

Individual racism is far different from systemic and systematic racism.

A Brahmin Indian immigrant like Sojwal is a pretty good contender for least-oppressed group in America. Top of the charts in income by ethnicity, college admissions, low crime rates.

White people falling far behind east asians in practically every measurement shows what a crock of crap "systemic racism" is.

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#57
post #11

A lot of drama here that seems to spill out into real life. Two opposing sides. But, they're largely on the same side it seems like. One seems to have made a mistake in submitting her article unknowingly to a blog that doesn't accept articles from white women, and the other wasn't happy about this or the tone from the first person.

> made a mistake in submitting her article unknowingly to a blog that doesn't accept articles from white women I am still pretty aghast that the liberal side thinks that is acceptable without irony.

Hence the need to think in more than a 1 dimensional description of the entire political landscape.

Re: White Women Need Not Apply

#58

I feel like I'm so burnt out from reading about conflict. I can't even comment on who is right or wrong...it feels like such an overinflated digital age argument.

> digital age argument

There is something about the lack of personal connection that leads to extremes in the digital environment. I have a feeling that if these people had met over coffee to discuss her story it would have been a non-issue. Instead, disagreements and mistakes blow up, because once an audience is involved it's very hard for either side to back down.

Sometimes it's a challenge, but I always think 'is this how I would act if this person was sitting in front of me'.

Post reply on HN