Live data from Hacker News

Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

blog.twitter.com

201–210 of 371 posts

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#201
post #8

>Second, we will prevent “liked by” and “followed by” recommendations from people you don’t follow from showing up in your timeline and won’t send notifications for these Tweets. These recommendations can be a helpful way for people to see relevant conversations from outside of their network, but we are removing them because we don’t believe the “Like” button provides sufficient, thoughtful consideration prior to amp…

Squaring it is pretty easy, I think. Recommendation engines are neither inherently good or harmful -- think of them as an amplifier. In normal times, they work pretty well -- it gives you more of the stuff you like, which usually isn't harmful. Just entertaining/fluff/interesting/whatever. But closer to an election, they can be gamed and weaponized for harm -- Russia can activate botnets, fake accounts, etc. and lies…

> But closer to an election, they can be gamed and weaponized for harm

But there's elections all the time. There's many different elections in the US alone, any many many more throughout the world.

And elections are just one thing, what about influence over opinions for bills/law/reforms? Wars? Public opinion about basically any subject, from economics to gender/race/class tensions?

If you accept that social media is weaponised for this election, it seems naive to not accept it is being weaponised absolutely all the time

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#202
post #8

>Second, we will prevent “liked by” and “followed by” recommendations from people you don’t follow from showing up in your timeline and won’t send notifications for these Tweets. These recommendations can be a helpful way for people to see relevant conversations from outside of their network, but we are removing them because we don’t believe the “Like” button provides sufficient, thoughtful consideration prior to amp…

>"we're gonna turn it back on in four weeks" This is my recurring issue when I see most "changes we're making for the election" posts. Sure this seems like a good step for this election. Fake news and the destabilization it can bring isn't just an American phenomenon though. Are they going to apply these precautions to elections in Brazil, or Myanmar?

Many people will stop watering their lawns during a drought. But they usually start up again after it passes.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#203

Reading these headlines is like living in a dystopian waking nightmare. This is not remotely at all the role that Twitter or any other Silicon Valley tech company should play in society.

>Twitter plays a critical role...facilitating meaningful political debate"

Has Twitter actually read Twitter?

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the situation in the USA is quite unique. UK and Australia is not (as of yet) in any serious risk of their democracy being undermined in the next election. Sure you can say they could have had similar measures before the Kyrgyzstan or the Belarus elections. But there bad actors were perfectly able to undermine the democracy without the aid of social media.

Taking all the necessary steps so that one exact candidate (Trump) won't win the next election is "undermining democracy" already, especially as those steps now come from both business (Twitter, FB) and the media (Washington Post, NYTimes). Maybe the Democrats and the people who are called "liberals" don't realise it just yet, but they've lost the game because they've started playing Trump's game. Like I said, they m…

It's unfortunate how few people on the inside don't see it this way. The slippery slope is real and we shouldn't start sliding down it just to beat Trump.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#205

We have zero ability to verify election integrity and now we're not allowed to talk about it. Slavery.

If the only thing stopping one party from ripping up ballots for their opponents is that someone might be able to tweet about this happening, then the election has already lost its integrity.

It's also worth thinking about which is more likely to happen: Twitter suppressing a true claim about election integrity being violated, or Twitter suppressing a false claim. Bear in mind that anyone can make a false claim.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>"we're gonna turn it back on in four weeks" This is my recurring issue when I see most "changes we're making for the election" posts. Sure this seems like a good step for this election. Fake news and the destabilization it can bring isn't just an American phenomenon though. Are they going to apply these precautions to elections in Brazil, or Myanmar?

Many people will stop watering their lawns during a drought. But they usually start up again after it passes.

I'm not sure if this statement is supportive of Twitter's decision or opposing the practice of not using drought-resistant landscaping.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#208
post #147
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is what the outsized tolerance for internal political activism inside SV companies has resulted in. (European observer)

That makes no sense to me. Do you think social networks would be less toxic and less abused if all the devs at Facebook or Twitter were apolitical? How would that work? It's the quest for "engagement" and getting always more users and ad views that generates this situation. What can be used to sell you shoes and earphones can also be used to sell you political ideas. When the algorithm wants to show you some inflamma…

> This American election can't be over soon enough, everybody seems to be losing their marbles.

Brace yourself then, because this election will not end on November 3rd. And the craziness we see today will be nothing compared to whats coming next. Regardless of which side "wins".

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#209

Reading these headlines is like living in a dystopian waking nightmare. This is not remotely at all the role that Twitter or any other Silicon Valley tech company should play in society.

I find it ironic this rhetoric is so prevalent on HN when usually HN users are the ones helping to make these websites.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#210
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are nuking them right now (temporarily). It's not just being discussed, it's being done . But most of the time people like getting content recommended. It's what consumers want.

Consumers also want cocaine, but that doesn't mean you get to sell it to them with impunity.

We cross a threshold if we treat information like cocaine.

A threshold that calls the First Amendment in the US into question.

Post reply on HN