I totally bought into the hype and paid $1k (CAD) for an OP-1 that's unfortunately collecting dust. It's a marvel of design and engineering, but I suck at making music. For anyone not familiar, these guys are kind of like a cheeky Apple of musical hardware design.
OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
81–90 of 221 posts
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#82Is there an actual magnetic tape inside or are they claiming a "recording" under the name "tape"? Left me kind of confused.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#83Is HN being subjected to some astroturf marketing techniques here? Seems rather suspicious to see so many commenters enthusiastically salivating over an advert for a very expensive radio. And also for said advert to hit the #1 spot on this site, despite not fitting into the usual categories for a compelling post.
It's ok that you are not privy to the hype around Teenage Engineering in general. Musicians like their devices because the UX design is interesting and relatively smooth, and the devices have a lot of flexibility for making interesting music.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#84Is HN being subjected to some astroturf marketing techniques here? Seems rather suspicious to see so many commenters enthusiastically salivating over an advert for a very expensive radio. And also for said advert to hit the #1 spot on this site, despite not fitting into the usual categories for a compelling post.
Actually just a huge fan and having owned 2 OP-1's, I'm just a big fan of Teenage Engineering.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#85Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#86Their line of synths is great, but a radio which doesn't support DAB? How am I going to listen to 6music?
The US digital radio effort has been complicated and slow to ramp up. Many digital streams are commercial free in an attempt to drive receiver adoption. Many cars still ship with no digital capability. Ordinary FM makes reasonable sense here.
The rest of the world has the DMB vs. DAB competition driving the adoption, and technical improvements, while USA still had the same HD Radio of 10 years ago, and near no mobile receivers.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#87Is HN being subjected to some astroturf marketing techniques here? Seems rather suspicious to see so many commenters enthusiastically salivating over an advert for a very expensive radio. And also for said advert to hit the #1 spot on this site, despite not fitting into the usual categories for a compelling post.
TE made one really stand-out product, the OP-1, and one kinda-pretty-good product, the OP-Z. They have a few other products of mixed reception and a bunch of typical high-end boutique junk if you really want their logo on your t-shirt or whatever. They're coasting on their reputation of the OP-1, which is deserved, but they haven't really come up with anything worthy of their reputation since.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#88Is HN being subjected to some astroturf marketing techniques here? Seems rather suspicious to see so many commenters enthusiastically salivating over an advert for a very expensive radio. And also for said advert to hit the #1 spot on this site, despite not fitting into the usual categories for a compelling post.
b) It's an expensive tech gadget, these are discussed here all the time?
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#89exposed drivers on a 'outdoor use' 600 dollar device gives me an extreme sense of anxiety. Reminds me of Braun products; products designed to look nice, but in general usability suffers in favor of sleek metal human interfaces, nice weights, and a generally 'quality' feel.
Re: OB–4 – Portable high fidelity loudspeaker
#90Is HN being subjected to some astroturf marketing techniques here? Seems rather suspicious to see so many commenters enthusiastically salivating over an advert for a very expensive radio. And also for said advert to hit the #1 spot on this site, despite not fitting into the usual categories for a compelling post.