Live data from Hacker News

Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

reuters.com

171–180 of 677 posts

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#171

Unlike some other commenters below, I don't believe that this is a privacy issue. Instead, I believe that it is a national security issue because TikTok is controllable by the CCP which is ideologically opposed to the United States. The next global conflict will likely be one between the east and the west, with control of information being advantageous to both sides in the conflict. China already blocks the western I…

By extension, you recommend Europe, India and most countries should block fb, twitter because this is too much power to let US have over them.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#172
post #106
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Instead, I believe that it is a national security issue Are you uncomfortable adopting that belief with literally no concrete evidence that anything of the sort is actually occurring? I don't know how you reconcile rule of law with such drastic interventions in the rights of companies without evidence of wrongdoing. If anything you can come up with in your most paranoid fantasies can be the basis of shutting down a…

This whole shift to China as the new "enemy" is fascinating. Even though Trump is more or less mental, and is recognised as such, he has somehow managed to whip up this new cold war frenzy even among his opponents in the media. I can barely remember any focus on China before Trump. Not saying that there shouldn't be any but it's still interesting how this can spread to the entire country even if the author is an untr…

Russia, Iran, and North Korea will be rotated back in again. The important thing is to maintain public support for increased defense expenditures.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#173
post #62
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Instead, I believe that it is a national security issue Are you uncomfortable adopting that belief with literally no concrete evidence that anything of the sort is actually occurring? I don't know how you reconcile rule of law with such drastic interventions in the rights of companies without evidence of wrongdoing. If anything you can come up with in your most paranoid fantasies can be the basis of shutting down a…

> shutting down a company It's not a company. It's a division of a foreign government. That was the point being made. If it was an independent company, none of this would be happening.

> It's not a company. It's a division of a foreign government.

Can you elaborate on this? As far as I can tell this is just not the case, and none of the people saying it are clarifying what they mean.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#174
post #136
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...being controlled by the CCP is what makes it different. All of these sites/apps have the ability to shove propaganda in the faces of millions of people, only one of them is run by a government.

And what prohibits any three letter agency hiring some intermediary and do the same thing on Facebook for example?

> hiring some intermediaries

There's absolutely no need. Facebook cooperates with three-letter agencies, and we expect them to.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any business with china is a national security issue. There's plenty of evidence to the level of dictatorship in China. It's your responsibility to look at its history and make reasonable conclusions from it. If you want some sort of smoking gun evidence you're not going to find it, unless you somehow have a security clearance in China good enough to gain knowledge about their operations. It's a Chinese company, they…

>It's a Chinese company, they have privledges, not rights. Neither Bytedance nor TikTok are Chinese companies. It's true that Bytedance has buildings in Beijing, and a Chinese app (Taotiao) that is a Chinese subsidiary, but Bytedance is a Cayman's Islands company and TikTok doesn't even have servers inside China. For purposes of the Chinese National Intelligence Law compelling the company to share user information wi…

>... Bytedance is a Cayman's Islands company...

Sure, it's incorporated in the Caymans, but we all know that that is just a technicality.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#176

Unlike some other commenters below, I don't believe that this is a privacy issue. Instead, I believe that it is a national security issue because TikTok is controllable by the CCP which is ideologically opposed to the United States. The next global conflict will likely be one between the east and the west, with control of information being advantageous to both sides in the conflict. China already blocks the western I…

> China already blocks the western Internet, so they have an advantage by default.

That might be an advantage to the Communist party but it's not an advantage to China as a nation, or its citizenry.

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#177
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> shutting down a company It's not a company. It's a division of a foreign government. That was the point being made. If it was an independent company, none of this would be happening.

Bytedance is not owned by the Chinese government. It's an independent company, as is TikTok.

> As with many Chinese companies, the company has an internal Chinese Communist Party committee serving the party members among the employees, with vice president Zhang Fuping serving as its Party Committee Secretary. It also has a strategic partnership with the Ministry of Public Security for the ministry's public relations efforts, and joint ventures with a state-run publisher in Beijing and media firm in Shanghai. ... It has garnered public attention over allegations that it worked with the Chinese Communist Party to censor and surveil content pertaining to Xinjiang re-education camps and other topics the Party deemed controversial.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ByteDance

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#179

Pornhub is a foreign company, perhaps Trump should ban that too. It could be a national security threat for a foreign company to know the porn habits of government officials, they could use that to blackmail military generals and the like. /sarcasm

This is a poor argument, including the sarcasm. Pornhub is a Canadian company. Last time I checked, Canada was still a democratic country with an ideology roughly aligned with that of the US.

We're going to have to look at their investors very strongly. Many people are saying they're being funded by China. Maybe they are maybe they aren't, but it could be a national security threat if China is funding them. We have the best porn, that I can tell you. America First!

Re: Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads from U.S. app stores

#180
post #153
post #126

It's strange how so many in the US have adopted the mindset that it's important, for national security, to deny its citizens access to foreign social networks. Previously, when China did the same, this was widely viewed as an unfortunate restriction their freedoms -- the actions of an intrusive, authoritarian government. Now that the US is itself considering doing the same, many in the west have suddenly adopted the…

The US is a democratic government with the rule of law, as seen in this very example with a judge blocking the order.

I see you're drinking the koolaid...
Post reply on HN