Live data from Hacker News

Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

kalzumeus.com

251–260 of 269 posts

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was reading this comment on my phone and had to jump on my computer to say: you should absolutely take this article/Haseeb seriously, yes people say these exact things over the phone. I was looking for a new job in the recent past along with a family member (both software eng. roles), and spent a good chunk of time doing research - reading articles like this - and practicing (eventually via companies early in my "p…

And you're in the bay area as well? I'm arguing against the specific examples, not negotiating in general (that is a good thing to do). I really don't see these long messages/emails getting anywhere, in my experience HR have dropped the ball for less than that. It's over the top to send them long messages in writing that you will never accept whatever number they give and reserve the right to disagree anytime.

Nope, middle-tier US city.

One of the offers was FAANG, but a small office. To be clear, I did not do most of this over email, but I used very similar wording in my phone calls.

I never had more than 2 offers at once, and I don't think you need to try and time everything so that you can bet everyone against each other. You really just need 1 other good offer, which was my case. And non-negotiable deadlines have always been extended. Some companies got annoyed that I didn't decide within a few days(especially startups, probably since they are trying to hire super fast), but others were very patient and willing to let me finish interviewing as long as I was upfront with the timing.

> It's over the top to send them long messages in writing that you will never accept whatever number they give and reserve the right to disagree anytime.

I don't think that is the take away at all. You need to be clear that you are still interviewing and thinking things over, and once I got offers from my top choices, I made it clear exactly what it would take to get me to accept immediately, and that counter-offer was not a fantastical number. If you set goal posts, you can always point to them as your reason for not accepting. It's definitely bad form to not provide any feedback on what you're willing to take once you get far enough into the negotiation.

If you're not a compelling candidate, and for at least one of the companies, I wasn't compelling enough, they absolutely will stop the conversation.

But I think it's a case-by-case thing. Not every company will respond the same. I also spent a fair amount of time researching what different companies probably paid for a generalist SWE, which for FAANGs is a lot easier these days, so I knew what some boundaries were.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And imagine how readers from other countries feel! Even in Canada, the salaries people throw around in this forum are almost not believable

Canadian here, just signed an offer (Not FAANG) for ~360k TC, 30k of that was negotiated up based on advice from this patio11 article. The opportunities are out there, especially now that companies are going remote.

so they started you out at 330k? what were the determinants going into that starting offer? that's pretty great

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#253
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In all the places I've worked, every engineer knew there was another place where they'd likely earn significantly more. Yet, they didn't jump ship. These were not high turnaround places. Either my experience is exceptional, or your implication that money is the only thing that matters about a job is wrong.

Maybe you have worked at decent companies, but if someone is "meh" about their job, they will bounce before long.

Yep, that was my entire point.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#254
post #119

At nearly 7,000 words, you probably don’t want to try reading this on an iDevice Wait, what? For most people, their iDevice will be the best reading experience they have access to.

> For most people, their iDevice will be the best reading experience they have access to. The article is from 2012. iDevices were a lot less impressive back then.

Reading on an iDevice in 2012 was light years ahead of almost everything else, owing to their displays.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#255
post #245
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but we can get much more accomplished with 1 more person on the team Are you sure of that? Two people can usually accomplish much more than one person, but how much more do you achieve with 5 people rather than 4? My guess would be that adding the fifth person to a team increases productivity between 5-15%.

It would depend upon the work. If the work is embarrassingly parallel, then 25% more. (5/4 = 1.25, of course) If there is too much work for four people to function effectively, perhaps more than 25%. If the work requires a lot of inter-process communication, perhaps less than 25%.

You're right, thank you.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As we build out our salary comparison startup, peerwyse.com, I intend to openly offer properly shit salaries but great "everything else" You don't see any irony in offering "shit salaries" trying to build a salary comparison startup? What do you intend to do if and when candidates use your very popular competitor levels.fyi (which, just so you know, they already do)?

Knowing what you're trading for what is, IMO, the important bit. I want to find the things you value more than money and offer those.

Money is around the top of things people value in a job. It's very hard, to impossible, to make up for a crap salary.

At the very least pay market rate (i.e. an average salary) and then add benefits to turn average into good.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Knowing what you're trading for what is, IMO, the important bit. I want to find the things you value more than money and offer those.

I understand why that is your goal. What I don't understand is how you can credibly claim you offer something more valuable. To actively hire at less than market range is to tacitly admit (whether intentionally or not) that you neither can afford nor adequately deploy the difference you're paying for. If that is the case, what kind of a message do you think that sends me about your serviceable obtainable market and y…

This is a great point. (Un)fortunately we have not had to but this into practice yet so when we do perhaps I will monumentally fail.

Based on my limited (10 years) experience I'm pretty convinced that there is little to no correlation between competence, confidence and compensation.

There are many people for whom work is not the most important thing in their lives. My expectation is that actively selecting for work not being the most important thing in someones life is an arbitrage that is under utilised and will create a much more sustainable company in the medium to long term.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Knowing what you're trading for what is, IMO, the important bit. I want to find the things you value more than money and offer those.

Money is around the top of things people value in a job. It's very hard, to impossible, to make up for a crap salary. At the very least pay market rate (i.e. an average salary) and then add benefits to turn average into good.

Money is at the top for many people, though I would claim on a household level.

In my case my income really isn't the primary determinant of my household income. As the secondary earner being able to support the primary earner fully is of much more value to my longterm household income than fighting tooth and nail for an extra $20k p.a.

Since many competent people couple up into two earner households actively targeting the secondary earners by offering the things that are more valuable to them than money feels like a "society-hack" that should be achievable.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd much rather hire 4 above average people than 5 average people. Having more people adds its own cost and there is a Pareto law in people's contributions. Edit: Basically, IMHO, in terms of assembling the best team to deliver the best results it's better to keep things as small as possible. But in terms of internal company politics it's better to grow the team as much as possible.

I'm very skeptical you can tell from an interview who's good. As we build out our salary comparison startup, peerwyse.com, I intend to openly offer properly shit salaries but great "everything else": some level of budgetary autonomy, a family first mentality, option to work three or four days a week for (50% or 75% of pay) and 25% of accumulated total comp on the day you leave us (whether by redundancy, better job or…

> option to work three or four days a week for (50% or 75% of pay)

Work 60% for 50% pay or work 80% for 75% pay? Sounds like a raw deal to me.

Re: Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued (2012)

#260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Canadian here, just signed an offer (Not FAANG) for ~360k TC, 30k of that was negotiated up based on advice from this patio11 article. The opportunities are out there, especially now that companies are going remote.

At a Canadian company? A while ago I took a position with a US company who offered quite a bit more than the Canadian org I left. Would be happy to return to Canadian tech but haven't found shops where the money is comparable. TBF haven't been aggressively searching though, but curious about your experience.

US company, but that's just my point that there are more US companies willing to hire Canadians remotely.
Post reply on HN