Live data from Hacker News

Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

nypost.com

181–190 of 328 posts

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#181
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes there's something going on we don't understand, because some places that were hit very hard first time round are not seeing a second wave.

Perhaps the "something" is simply antibodies and herd immunity? 1. In April (!!), 1 in 5 NYCers tested positive for antibodies: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/nyregion/coronavirus-anti... 2. Given asymmetric social contact patterns, experts estimate that ~20% may be the threshold for herd immunity of COVID: https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-could-it-be-burning-... I support looking at the science, and this…

It's not antibody immunity. That's why I said we don't understand. 20% is nowhere near enough to explain the patterns we're seeing.

The good news is that even though we don't understand it, the NY experience does point towards a potentially more muted second wave in areas which were hit hard the first time round (as long as they take precautions at least), but we just don't know enough to be sure - anyone who is sure about the outcome at this point is probably overconfident and wrong.

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#182
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If people are scared and won't go to restaurants and bars then why continue to keep them closed? You are saying that patronage is already down so why even restrict them? Give people and businesses a choice in the matter. This is about letting individuals and businesses make their own decisions without the government forcing them to close.

That would be fine and dandy if the decision to engage in risky behaviour only affects the individuals and businesses making them. However, this is not the case in reality.

[deleted]

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If people are scared and won't go to restaurants and bars then why continue to keep them closed? You are saying that patronage is already down so why even restrict them? Give people and businesses a choice in the matter. This is about letting individuals and businesses make their own decisions without the government forcing them to close.

This isn’t about people making decisions for themselves. It’s about preventing the spread of infectious disease. You might be fine, but if you are asymptomatic, you can directly harm or kill others and not even know it. That being said, I’m not sure what the best policy is. It doesn’t seem feasible to have a complete lockdown that extends for many months. So we have to be clever, keep learning, and find good solution…

> This isn’t about people making decisions for themselves

Making decisions for ones self is exactly the principal that the USA was founded on.

> You might be fine, but if you are asymptomatic, you can directly harm or kill others and not even know it.

See also: Drinking, condom-less sex, smoking, and junk food. All of these things directly or indirectly harm others and if this is about public safety then it's time yourself and others start movements to ban them.

The "you may be hurting people indirectly" argument never worked and it's getting more brittle with time.

Have a good laugh with me this Sunday night: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXWhbUUE4ko

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#184
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In Nashville they closed bars and restaurants for 6 months because .004% of the cases came from bars and restaurants. You're taking the number of cases that they've managed to contact trace to bars (difficult, especially if lots of cases all at once). You're then dividing that by the total number of cases, including the ones after they closed bars and concluding that it was the incorrect choice.

No am I am not but I understand your assumptive nature. I did speak incorrectly. Here is a repost of my previous comment: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8743605/Nashville-m... In Nashville, TN (USA) bars and restaurants are closed to stop the spread of the virus. In e-mails obtained by a local television station, and later confirmed authentic by legal council, the e-mails discussed how only 80 of the 20,000…

> a city of 2 million aka .004% of the population.

Oh so it's the population now? I forgot that the whole city of Nashville was infected.

Not going to respond further.

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#185
post #73
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

God no. They've been sitting on empty buildings for years. It's time for them to default on the underwater loans and let people actually put the wasted space to use. Every city in the US has a similar issue including the one near where I grew up and it's the weirdest most broken thing. I remember many times walking down streets flanked by empty buildings with homeless people sleeping outside.

If they have been sitting on empty buildings for years, why would they want renters now? I expect they would just continue to keep their buildings empty and continue to be unaffected by this pandemic.

Not enough cash to keep up the stupid speculation game without some paying renters.

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If people are scared and won't go to restaurants and bars then why continue to keep them closed? You are saying that patronage is already down so why even restrict them? Give people and businesses a choice in the matter. This is about letting individuals and businesses make their own decisions without the government forcing them to close.

This isn’t about people making decisions for themselves. It’s about preventing the spread of infectious disease. You might be fine, but if you are asymptomatic, you can directly harm or kill others and not even know it. That being said, I’m not sure what the best policy is. It doesn’t seem feasible to have a complete lockdown that extends for many months. So we have to be clever, keep learning, and find good solution…

There is a lot of things that can indirectly harm others. Unless you can show that opening up is much more dangerous to others than those other things, it makes no sense to selectively ban opening up. Given bars and restaurants are already open in other states (and other countries) without any significant increase in deaths compared to California and New York, where's the data showing opening up bars and restaurants is dangerous?

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#187
post #42
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Over the course of a given rental, unless the property was purchased almost immediately before a real-estate crash or rental crisis, the amount of cashflow generated by a tenant will cover the majority of the volume required to generate equity in the property. In certain cases, the financing for commercial real estate, for instance, will literally substitute the credit rating of tenants for those of the landlords - b…

This ignores the fact that if there were such obvious financial incentives, then restaurant owners would simply just buy said properties. 'Property management' is a real thing and businesses don't want to necessarily own property. Managing property is a service like any other - and rates for their goods are market based - just like any other market. "If a landlord is rendered insolvent, they aren't even rendered dest…

> it's not rational to single out one form of business as being 'better or worse' than another.

But it is. If a business decreases social welfare (like cartels enabling coordination to jack up prices) the government should regulate it away. Most of what landlords do is cause friction in the real estate market (and hurting everyone else in the process) in hopes to gain some more mpney from it.

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#189
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

nyc and other municipalities really bungled the categorization of risk. restaurants and bars shouldn't have been lumped together in the first place. most restaurants could have employed some modest measures and stayed open at 80-90% capacity (which may be below break-even for some, but probably enough to ride out the pandemic with price hikes and/or modest gov loans), as risk is isolated between tables (no, that one…

I feel like this might ignore that a good portion of restaurant sales are from the bar. Chilis, Applebees, to an extent BJs Restaurant. I feel only a few companies have adopted to the fact that you can deliver alcohol. There's no reason that those bar sales, can't be from the restaurant over postmates or uber eats.

> There's no reason that those bar sales, can't be from the restaurant over postmates or uber eats.

Except for the prices, maybe? While it is true that most restaurants make most (or even all) of their profits with drinks, customers probably realize that they are paying 200% markup for a zero-effort service if they ordered beers from a restaurant instead of getting them themselves...

Re: Almost 90 percent of NYC bars and restaurants couldn’t pay August rent

#190
post #123

What leverage do landlords have in enforcing payment, if no one would move in if they evict a business? I certainly would only pay very discounted rent until society reopens and I think it would be insane for anyone to suggest otherwise.

None because if they try anything the business goes broke and they get nothing.
Post reply on HN