Live data from Hacker News

Build Personal Moats

eriktorenberg.substack.com

41–50 of 84 posts

Re: Build Personal Moats

#41
>> Get So Good They Can’t Ignore You

From my experience this is fiction. If those who control the means of production don't like you or your personality, they will ignore you and actively work to suppress you.

This happened to me. I was constantly overlooked for promotion and ignored in spite of an impressive proven track record and being a workaholic.

After 2 years of delivering a lot of value and working like crazy, I quit the company in a dramatic way.

I was so frustrated with my job that I had a breakdown and insulted the CTO in front of the CEO before quitting. I burned that bridge because I knew subconsciously that these people had already been suppressing me a long time, that if they wanted to get revenge after I left, it wouldn't change anything; they'd already been sabotaging me the whole way through.

I was right about that because after I quit, the project's community ended up supporting me and I was able to continue my work outside of the company (I suspect my ex-bosses did try to sabotage me BTW). So yes, they can ignore you no matter how good you are and how hard you work. Members of certain minority groups within the company will understand this notion very well though it can apply to anyone. You may have to seek support from an entirely different group of people.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#43

Look at the premise here: your life is a competition, a fight. People are coming for you and you'd better have a moat if you want to keep your position. Also, solve the ikigai which has 4 simultaneous variables to optimize. Protip: live simply, save at a decent rate, get financial freedom and you can solve the much simpler 3-dimensional ikigai.

> get financial freedom How? In The Netherlands, I don't know how to do this other than working in the HFT industry.

https://wiki.earlyretirementextreme.com/wiki/What_is_ERE%3F

Re: Build Personal Moats

#44

Look at the premise here: your life is a competition, a fight. People are coming for you and you'd better have a moat if you want to keep your position. Also, solve the ikigai which has 4 simultaneous variables to optimize. Protip: live simply, save at a decent rate, get financial freedom and you can solve the much simpler 3-dimensional ikigai.

> get financial freedom How? In The Netherlands, I don't know how to do this other than working in the HFT industry.

I know you just want to bitch about the vermogensbelasting, but:

- Go work in the HFT industry. :P

- A good freelance dev can pull in about 80-100 euro/hour which leads to a monthly pretax income of >10k euro. This is almost four times the median monthly household income. Even if you maintain a level of spending double that of the median, you can still save 50% of your income.

- Even a "normal" senior dev in the Amsterdam area can pull in 5-6k euro per month, which is still double the median household income.

- Since you are saving so much, buying a house in the suburbs like Almere or Delft or Hoofddorp (assuming you work in/near Amsterdam) becomes much more feasible. If you can work remotely, get a house in the northeast and save yourself another 100k. Make sure to use your continuing savings for paying down your mortgage as early as possible. Most Dutch banks allow for 10% per year early repayment without but some allow for more.

- Simultaneously, invest a little time in skills like cooking that will enable you to have a good life in hedonism terms without having to spend a lot.

- Now that you have a paid off home and low expenses, you won't need to pay a mortgage anymore and can increase your savings rate even more. Start investing in income generating instruments like bonds, dividend generating stocks or even real estate.

- Repeat this last procedure for ~10 years until income from investments exceeds expenses.

- Do the cperciva thing (see the post at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24537865) and work on whatever you find interesting.

There's a whole community of people in various stages of this process at the DutchFIRE subreddit if you want to know more. This strategy won't allow you to spend like a rapper trying to impress his friends, but it's a solid, low-risk approach that has worked hundreds of times already, even in relatively high Cost-of-Living areas like the randstad. Of course, if you just want to bitch about high taxes that's also fine ;)

Re: Build Personal Moats

#45
post #37

For the sake of good discussion about moats from different angles: The moats in the article seem to be for a public personal brand tied to a niche skill that could make you a go-to expert for a while (a tool for others to use). That may work if you want to be the next Jason, Tim Ferris, Naval, etc to attract people, jobs, deal-flow, or funding, but what if you don’t want to give up your privacy or be subject to const…

> In the corporate world rise in the ranks is credited to: PIE (Perspiration + Intelligence + Exposure) where exposure gives you 80% of the gains. (Source: executives mentoring at a large corporation)

This is very good advice.

Some of the best career advice I ever got, and the first thing I share with anyone asking for career advice, is to develop strong public speaking skills. Study it and join groups like Toastmasters to get some practice. Give internal talks. Speak at user groups and, as your skills grow, speak at conferences.

This is one of the keys that unlocks that valuable exposure.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#46
post #40

This concept is dangerously close to the antipattern of information hoarding and hero culture. Yes, from your personal perspective building such moat can be advantageous, but from the company perspective - or if you are a manager and see such behaviour, you should: - Document "Hard to learn and hard to do" processes. Make sure new hires can understand these processes easily. - Seek workarounds for "Impossible without…

As someone who agrees with the article and also agrees that the listed antipatterns you listed are bad, I've observed that following these two steps you suggested can help actually help build personal moats:

1.

Writing documentation is helpful for everyone, but it is more helpful in building a moat for the writer than it is for the reader.

When I document hard-to-learn processes, I drill the process into my memory in a way that the followers of the process are glad have avoided -- a win-win! And by seeing the results of people attempting to follow my documentation, I get valuable feedback on how adaptable my processes are to others, which helps me easily adapt the processes to new situations even for myself.

2.

Avoiding processes that rely on a hero avoids building useless moats.

It's good to avoid processes that rely on a hero. Teams should try to replace hero roles with repeatable processes as much as possible, but after doing this, often there are some hero roles left. These are roles are usually done by people with an ability to do critical but unforeseeable one-off tasks in a way that's very hard to train or hire others for. I'd need to hire a team to replace each of these people!

As someone who wants to build a personal moat, I actually want to work on teams that do this kind of "hero role pruning", because in those teams, any hero role I happen to fall into is one with actual value that's hard to replace.

---

If I were to mesh together the article, your response, and my responses here to create a more nuanced criticism about the article, it would be that the moat one builds should come from things that are naturally hard for other people to do, not by one artificially making things harder for other people.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#47
This is incredibly bad advice. If you want to achieve a great career, you need to "move up". This is one way to slightly increase the chance of not getting fired, at the cost of a guarantee you won't be moving up ...

If you have zero ambition ... perhaps. If you want to have a great career, you absolutely want to avoid this way.

And frankly, even if you have zero ambition at work, still a very dangerous game to play. Management might choose to force the issue by firing you JUST because you have a moat, forcing the org to build the knowledge that way. And, since we're talking about 20-30 year timeframes here, things go obsolete.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#48
post #37

For the sake of good discussion about moats from different angles: The moats in the article seem to be for a public personal brand tied to a niche skill that could make you a go-to expert for a while (a tool for others to use). That may work if you want to be the next Jason, Tim Ferris, Naval, etc to attract people, jobs, deal-flow, or funding, but what if you don’t want to give up your privacy or be subject to const…

> “Don’t ever become irreplaceable, because when you can’t be replaced, you can’t be prompted.”

This is a little bit context dependent. I’ve spent a large portion of my career as a contractor. I’ve never tried to make myself irreplaceable, but it usually happens. Being seen as irreplaceable when your contract has to be renewed every 3 months can be pretty profitable.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#49
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> get financial freedom How? In The Netherlands, I don't know how to do this other than working in the HFT industry.

How big is the HFT industry in the Netherlands? Is this just something you can chose to do?

Of course not. Unless you have both the right CV and the right connections, I guess.

Re: Build Personal Moats

#50
post #37

For the sake of good discussion about moats from different angles: The moats in the article seem to be for a public personal brand tied to a niche skill that could make you a go-to expert for a while (a tool for others to use). That may work if you want to be the next Jason, Tim Ferris, Naval, etc to attract people, jobs, deal-flow, or funding, but what if you don’t want to give up your privacy or be subject to const…

> “Don’t ever become irreplaceable, because when you can’t be replaced, you can’t be prompted.” This is a little bit context dependent. I’ve spent a large portion of my career as a contractor. I’ve never tried to make myself irreplaceable, but it usually happens. Being seen as irreplaceable when your contract has to be renewed every 3 months can be pretty profitable.

You might be like me – also a contractor, happily and for many years now, because I have no particular desire to “climb the ladder” at a corporation. Zero desire whatsoever to be the CEO of anything that’s not mine.

That’s not to say that I haven’t grown in my career. My skills, knowledge, interpersonal relationships, have all grown. My salary has grown with, as a result. But I’m happy in my spot, happy with the independence that being a contractor gives me, and happy not to have to play the corporate game.

Post reply on HN