Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if anyone has tried to measure repression's "drag coefficient" effect on creativity.
This is a very interesting question and one would hope that non repressive societies are more creative and have a higher scientific output. Im not 100 % sure thats the case, however.
China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
31–40 of 113 posts
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's actually a decent answer, thanks. But they're an economic-only organization. The EU didn't bomb Libya, France and Britain did.
One of the arguments for Brexit was that they’re becoming far more than an economic-only organisation
With time, as it entrenches and everyone believes in their hearts that the EU is going nowhere, then it will be less nice.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#33Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#34I think this is a very good move for China and think the US should match it.
If you actually read the article we already outspend them on R&D. We spent 2.8% of GDP vs their 2.2% of GDP. They failed to meet their target of 2.5% of GDP despite steadily increasing.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a very interesting question and one would hope that non repressive societies are more creative and have a higher scientific output. Im not 100 % sure thats the case, however.
It seems to me that it would have to. If your society punishes/limits/eliminates divergent behavior and thought, you are throttling your innovation lever. I think that rising D&I budgets are a recognition of this truth. It seems like common sense to me, but I'd be interested to know if it has been studied/measured...
What can be a drag on innovation is if there is nepotism. If the leader appoints his good-for-nothing nephew to science minister. Or if there is corruption, and well connected incumbents throw up endless barriers for innovative upcomers. Or if organized crime steal too much value from the productive people.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#36I think this is a very good move for China and think the US should match it.
If you actually read the article we already outspend them on R&D. We spent 2.8% of GDP vs their 2.2% of GDP. They failed to meet their target of 2.5% of GDP despite steadily increasing.
Rather than focusing on R&D (science & technology presumably), I'd like to see Western countries start approaching ~"the humanities" (culture, society, happiness, etc) the same way we treat technology and industry. To me it seems fairly clear that there are distinct differences at the human satisfaction level between different countries/cultures. I have the sense that Western countries are starting to fall behind in some categories, the consequences of which first began showing up in our political discourse/mood, which has now progressed to literally spilling out onto the streets. Rather than our current laissez faire approach to this aspect of life, could treating it as a serious first class intellectual problem yield positive results?
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#37I think this is a very good move for China and think the US should match it.
If you actually read the article we already outspend them on R&D. We spent 2.8% of GDP vs their 2.2% of GDP. They failed to meet their target of 2.5% of GDP despite steadily increasing.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you actually read the article we already outspend them on R&D. We spent 2.8% of GDP vs their 2.2% of GDP. They failed to meet their target of 2.5% of GDP despite steadily increasing.
But their purchasing power parity is way higher so presumably they get more for less, other than stuff they have to import to support research.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you give an example of a significant power, any time in history, that did have a lot of qualms with using repression for political ends? Even the Athenians had slaves.
The US? They do it, but they have a lot of qualms about it.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems to me that it would have to. If your society punishes/limits/eliminates divergent behavior and thought, you are throttling your innovation lever. I think that rising D&I budgets are a recognition of this truth. It seems like common sense to me, but I'd be interested to know if it has been studied/measured...
As long as you pay lip service to the right politics you can innovate as much as you want in science and technologies. You are free to use tabs for indentation or write your webservice in brainfuck if you want. What can be a drag on innovation is if there is nepotism. If the leader appoints his good-for-nothing nephew to science minister. Or if there is corruption, and well connected incumbents throw up endless barri…