101–110 of 128 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not my problem. As a user I should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The offending party should pay the price.
That's not the server's problem. As the server, they should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The users (which includes the bots) should pay the price.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Audio and video evidence isn't admissible because it's audio or video (and may be inadmissible nonetheless). It's admissible because someone testifies under oath that they have personal knowledge of its provenance. The burden is on the party introducing the evidence to show that it's reliable, and the question of whether or not it is indeed reliable is a factual one for a judge or jury to answer. It's not assumed to…
It will be inadmissable because of the psychological effects. Imagine having someone claim you murdered someone. Also you happened to drive by that park where the person was murdered at the same time. Now someone wants to frame you, perhaps because you are a celebrity or a person with money to extort from. So they claim that they saw you murder this person. Normally, this wouldn't hold any water and no jury would con…
Also you should see the type of video evidence used in court. It’s grainy 5 FPS surveillance footage that doesn’t even show their face. Deepfakes are not necessary if you want to frame someone.
Interesting. Two things that I found interesting: 1) ip addresses he uses have probably really good reputation, because even with rather bad image recognition ability it still lets him in. 2) surprisingly enough google's captcha apparently doesn't consider mouse movements at all - the bot selects images rapidly one immediately after another and always clicks in the same place of image.
Yep, it's Google cookie based, not behavior on the page. You can only use the tab and enter key to successfully complete the captcha if you have enough Google cookies.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sci-fi author John Varley covered this in one of his novels. In a society where anything digital can be manipulated, the veracity of a speech or event depends on a network of trust and people who witnessed the event in real life . If someone made a speech in front of hundreds of live, physically present spectators, these spectators can then verify the authenticity of any recording, and as long as there people in that…
What happens when there's a global pandemic and everyone is forced to stay home and not attend witness any of these speeches, but instead has to watch the broadcast over the internet and/or TV?
Ideally anyways. Realistically, we probably just argue on the internet about which talks were real (in this case generated by the person pictured in them).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not the server's problem. As the server, they should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The users (which includes the bots) should pay the price.
Do you want my business? I have gone elsewhere with my money instead of solving for crosswalks before
What percentage of websites that you use is that, exactly?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will be inadmissable because of the psychological effects. Imagine having someone claim you murdered someone. Also you happened to drive by that park where the person was murdered at the same time. Now someone wants to frame you, perhaps because you are a celebrity or a person with money to extort from. So they claim that they saw you murder this person. Normally, this wouldn't hold any water and no jury would con…
In your examples, it would most likely be a Mistrial scenario, the jury would be dismissed, and the prosecuting team would have to start over again from scratch later, assuming they aren't themselves in trouble for introducing faulty evidence.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not my problem. As a user I should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The offending party should pay the price.
That's not the server's problem. As the server, they should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The users (which includes the bots) should pay the price.
What is the Project Touch-Captcha (두 터치) mentioned in the readme?